Questioning the Author (QtA) transforms passive reading into active dialogue. Instead of receiving text as finished truth, you engage with the author as a person who made deliberate choices—and who might not have made them perfectly. This shift from reverence to conversation unlocks deeper comprehension.
What Is Questioning the Author?
Most readers approach text with an unconscious assumption: the author is an authority delivering truth, and your job is to receive it. If you don’t understand something, the fault must be yours. This assumption creates passive readers who struggle in silence rather than engaging actively with meaning.
Questioning the Author—often called the QtA strategy—flips this dynamic. Developed by researchers Isabel Beck and Margaret McKeown, QtA treats authors as real people making real choices. Authors have purposes, biases, limitations, and blind spots. They sometimes write unclear sentences, assume knowledge readers don’t have, or organize ideas in confusing ways. Recognizing this transforms reading from passive reception to active dialogue.
The core insight is simple but powerful: authors are fallible. They’re trying to communicate ideas, but they don’t always succeed perfectly. Your job as a reader isn’t to accept everything at face value—it’s to grapple with what the author is trying to say, evaluate whether they’ve said it clearly, and construct meaning through active engagement. This comprehension strategy builds both understanding and critical thinking simultaneously.
The Components of QtA
Understanding the QtA strategy means mastering its core questions:
“What is the author trying to say here?” This question cuts through surface-level reading to focus on intended meaning. Rather than just processing words, you’re actively reconstructing the author’s message. Sometimes this is clear; often it requires interpretation and inference.
“Why is the author telling me this?” Every sentence serves a purpose in the author’s larger plan. Asking why forces you to consider structure, argument development, and the author’s goals. Why this example? Why this detail here and not there? Why this word choice?
“Does the author explain this clearly?” This question grants yourself permission to notice confusion without self-blame. If a passage is unclear, maybe the author didn’t write it well. This isn’t arrogance—it’s accurate assessment. Professional editors exist precisely because authors often fail to communicate clearly on the first attempt.
“How does this connect to what the author said before?” This question tracks coherence across the text. Authors sometimes lose the thread, contradict themselves, or assume connections that aren’t obvious. Your job is to build these connections actively, noticing when they’re missing or weak.
Print carries inherent authority—if it’s published, it must be right. QtA breaks this spell. Published authors include brilliant writers and mediocre ones, careful thinkers and sloppy ones, experts and people writing outside their expertise. The same skepticism you’d apply to a stranger’s verbal claim should apply to their written one.
Why This Matters for Reading
The questioning the author approach addresses a fundamental problem: readers often don’t know they don’t understand. They process words without constructing meaning, recognize sentences as familiar without grasping their significance. When they hit confusion, they assume the problem is theirs and passively continue, hoping clarity will emerge.
QtA breaks this pattern by making comprehension monitoring explicit. When you ask “What is the author trying to say?” and can’t answer, you’ve identified a comprehension breakdown. When you ask “Does this connect to what came before?” and it doesn’t, you’ve found a gap. These aren’t failures—they’re exactly what active reading looks like.
Research shows QtA improves comprehension across ages and text types. Students using QtA engage more deeply with text, ask better questions, and construct more complete mental representations of content. The strategy works because it shifts readers from passive consumers to active meaning-makers.
You’re reading: “The economy showed resilient growth despite headwinds.”
Passive reader: “Okay, economy grew.” Moves on.
QtA reader: “What is the author trying to say? Growth happened but something made it harder. What headwinds? The author doesn’t specify. Why use ‘resilient’—is that the author’s opinion or a measurable claim? This sentence claims something without supporting it. I’ll keep reading to see if evidence follows, but I’m skeptical.”
How to Apply QtA
Implementing author questions effectively requires practice:
Start with challenging passages. You don’t need to question every sentence—that would be exhausting. Use QtA strategically when text gets difficult, confusing, or important. When you feel yourself glazing over, that’s the trigger to engage with author questions.
Externalize your dialogue. Especially when learning QtA, speak or write your questions and answers. “What is the author saying here? I think she’s arguing that X, but she’s assuming Y without proving it.” This externalization makes invisible comprehension processes visible.
Notice author choices. Every text represents thousands of decisions: what to include, what to omit, how to order information, which words to use. Train yourself to see these choices. Why did the author start with this anecdote? Why use a passive construction here? Why no counterarguments?
Be willing to criticize. QtA doesn’t work if you’re still deferring to author authority. Practice identifying genuine weaknesses: unclear explanations, missing evidence, logical gaps, assumed knowledge. This isn’t being harsh—it’s being honest about what you actually understand and what remains unsupported.
QtA means engaging critically, not dismissively. The goal isn’t to tear down every author but to understand what they’re actually claiming and whether they’ve supported those claims. Sometimes authors write beautifully clear, well-supported prose—QtA helps you recognize that too. Critical engagement means accurate evaluation, not automatic rejection.
Common Misconceptions
“This is just being critical for no reason.” QtA isn’t about finding fault—it’s about engaging deeply enough to actually understand what’s being claimed and whether it holds up. Most readers under-question text, not over-question it. The goal is accurate comprehension, which requires evaluation.
“I’m not qualified to question the author.” You’re not questioning their expertise in the subject—you’re questioning whether they’ve communicated that expertise clearly to you. Confusion is information. If something is unclear, that’s worth noting regardless of whether the fault lies with you or the author.
“This takes too long.” QtA is a tool, not a mandate. You don’t question every sentence—you deploy questions strategically when comprehension falters or stakes are high. With practice, the questioning process becomes faster and more automatic.
“Some texts are too authoritative to question.” No text is beyond questioning. Sacred texts, canonical literature, scientific papers, legal documents—all were written by people making choices. Even if you ultimately accept their authority, understanding those choices deepens comprehension.
Putting It Into Practice
Transform questioning the author from concept to habit:
- Choose a challenging text. Pick something you need to understand well—not light reading. Academic articles, complex arguments, or technical material work best for practicing QtA.
- Read until you hit confusion or importance. Don’t question everything from the start. Read normally until something seems unclear, surprising, or particularly significant. That’s your trigger.
- Deploy the core questions. What is the author trying to say? Why this here? Is this clear? How does it connect? Write your answers, even briefly. The act of answering forces deeper processing.
- Note genuine problems. When you identify unclear passages, unsupported claims, or missing connections, mark them. These aren’t just comprehension checks—they’re critical analysis developing in real time.
- Reconstruct the author’s purpose. After reading, articulate what the author was trying to accomplish overall. What did they want you to understand or believe? How well did they achieve it? This synthesis cements comprehension.
The QtA strategy isn’t just a reading technique—it’s a mindset shift that extends beyond reading. The same questions apply to lectures, presentations, and conversations: what is this person trying to say, why are they saying it, and is it actually clear and supported? Once you start thinking this way, you can’t stop—and your comprehension will never be passive again.
For related strategies that build active reading habits, explore the full Strategies & Retention pillar, or browse the complete Reading Concepts collection.
Frequently Asked Questions
Read Actively, Think Critically
QtA is just one tool in the active reader’s toolkit. The course provides 365 articles with guided questions—structured practice in the kind of engaged reading that transforms comprehension.
Start Learning →29 More Reading Concepts Await
You’ve learned to question the author. Now discover summarization, self-explanation, and the complete toolkit for active, critical reading.
All Strategies & Retention Articles
