Reading Comprehension equals Decoding multiplied by Language Comprehension. Both skills are essential — if either is zero, comprehension is zero.
What Is the Simple View of Reading?
The Simple View of Reading (SVR) is a research-backed framework that explains reading comprehension as the product of two distinct cognitive processes. Developed by Philip Gough and William Tunmer in 1986, this model has shaped how educators and researchers understand reading for nearly four decades.
At its core, the model proposes a deceptively simple formula: Reading Comprehension = Decoding × Language Comprehension. The multiplication sign is not arbitrary — it carries profound implications for how we understand reading difficulties and design interventions.
Think of it like a bicycle. Decoding is one wheel, language comprehension is the other. A bicycle with one wheel simply doesn’t work. You need both functioning together to move forward.
The Two Components Explained
Decoding (D): The Visual-to-Sound Bridge
Decoding is the ability to translate written symbols into language. When you see the letters C-A-T and recognize them as the word “cat,” you’re decoding. This process involves phonemic awareness (understanding that words are made of sounds), phonics knowledge (knowing which letters represent which sounds), and sight word recognition (instantly recognizing common words).
For skilled readers, decoding becomes automatic — you don’t consciously think about sounding out most words. This automaticity is crucial because it frees up mental resources for the harder work of comprehension.
When you read “The quick brown fox jumps,” you instantly recognize each word without sounding them out. But if you encounter “The perspicacious vulpine leapt,” you might slow down to decode “perspicacious” — and that slower processing affects how much mental energy remains for understanding the sentence.
Language Comprehension (LC): Understanding What You Hear
Language comprehension is your ability to understand spoken language. It encompasses vocabulary knowledge, grammar understanding, background knowledge, inference-making, and the ability to follow complex ideas.
Here’s the key insight: if you can’t understand a passage when someone reads it aloud to you, you won’t understand it when you read it yourself — no matter how well you decode the words.
Why the Multiplication Sign Matters
The formula uses multiplication, not addition, for a critical reason: if either component is zero (or near zero), the product is zero (or near zero).
- D × 0 = 0: Perfect decoding with no language comprehension yields no reading comprehension. A child might read aloud flawlessly in a language they don’t understand — but they won’t comprehend anything.
- 0 × LC = 0: Excellent language comprehension with no decoding ability also yields no reading comprehension. A highly intelligent person who cannot decode written words cannot read, no matter how sophisticated their vocabulary.
The multiplicative relationship explains a puzzling phenomenon: why do some children who read words fluently still struggle to understand what they read? The SVR model suggests their language comprehension — vocabulary, background knowledge, or inferencing ability — may be underdeveloped, even though their decoding is strong.
Why This Matters for Reading Development
The simple view of reading has practical implications for anyone trying to improve their reading:
- Diagnosis becomes clearer. When reading comprehension is poor, you need to identify which component is weak. Is the reader struggling to decode words, or can they decode but not understand? The intervention depends entirely on the answer.
- Training can be targeted. Someone with strong decoding but weak comprehension doesn’t need more phonics practice — they need vocabulary building, exposure to complex ideas, and comprehension strategy instruction.
- Balance is essential. Neither component alone produces skilled reading. A reading program that emphasizes only phonics or only meaning will leave learners underprepared.
The Relationship Between Components
While the SVR presents decoding and language comprehension as separate, they interact in important ways. As decoding becomes automatic, more mental resources become available for comprehension. As vocabulary grows, even decoding unfamiliar words becomes easier because you can use context clues.
The “Simple” in Simple View of Reading refers to the elegance of the model, not the simplicity of reading itself. Reading is incredibly complex — the model is a useful simplification that captures the two essential components.
Putting It Into Practice
Understanding the SVR transforms how you approach reading improvement:
- Diagnose before you practice. Don’t assume you know where your weakness lies. Test both components. Can you read passages aloud fluently? Do you understand material better when listening than reading?
- Target your weaker component. If decoding is automatic, more phonics practice won’t help. If comprehension is weak, reading faster will only make things worse.
- Build language comprehension deliberately. This means vocabulary work, wide reading across topics, and practice with increasingly complex texts.
- Don’t neglect either component. Even adult readers may have subtle decoding inefficiencies that consume mental resources needed for comprehension.
The simple view of reading remains one of the most useful frameworks for understanding why we read the way we do — and how we can read better. Whether you’re preparing for competitive exams or simply want to engage more deeply with challenging texts, understanding this formula is the first step toward strategic improvement.
Frequently Asked Questions
Turn Reading Science Into Reading Skill
Understanding the formula is step one. The course gives you 365 articles with analysis, 1,098 practice questions, and 6 structured courses — the practice that transforms knowledge into ability.
Start Learning →139 More Reading Concepts Await
You’ve learned the foundation. Now explore decoding, comprehension, fluency, retention, and every skill that builds expert readers — one concept at a time.
All Science of Reading Articles
