Your Daydreams Know Something You Don’t. Look Closely
Why Read This
What Makes This Article Worth Your Time
Summary
What This Article Is About
Vardah Bharuchi, a clinical psychologist practising in Karachi, Pakistan, argues that mind-wandering—which occupies up to 50 per cent of our waking hours according to Harvard researchers Matthew Killingsworth and Daniel Gilbert—is not mere distraction but a meaningful signal from the unconscious. While daydreaming can support creativity, moral reasoning, and even neuroplasticity, problems arise when imagination becomes the only reliable site of fulfilment. At the extreme end of this spectrum lies maladaptive daydreaming (MD), a clinical pattern coined by psychologist Eli Somer, characterised by excessive, compulsive fantasy that disrupts daily functioning. MD is not yet formally recognised in diagnostic manuals and shows overlaps with ADHD, OCD, and dissociative conditions.
Rather than simply suppressing daydreams, Bharuchi advocates attending to their content as a guide to unmet psychological needs. Recurring fantasies of love, recognition, or safety point towards real deprivations that mere symptom-reduction strategies leave untouched. Drawing on her clinical experience and the work of psychotherapist Susan Anderson, she outlines a reflective practice: notice the triggers and emotional themes of your daydreams, identify what feeling is missing from waking life, and consider how those needs might be addressed more directly. Writing a letter to one’s younger self is one such tool—a way of initiating a dialogue between the inner child and the present self that can begin to heal the longing beneath persistent fantasies.
Key Points
Main Takeaways
Half Our Waking Life Is Mind-Wandering
Harvard researchers Killingsworth and Gilbert found people think about what is not happening almost as often as what is — roughly 50 per cent of waking hours.
Daydreaming Has Real Benefits
Mind-wandering supports creativity, moral reasoning, risk-free exploration of possibilities, and may even contribute to neuroplasticity according to a 2023 Harvard study on mice.
MD Is Rooted in Early Adversity
Maladaptive daydreaming is consistently linked to childhood loneliness, bullying, trauma, or neglect — fantasy begins as a coping tool and can become a compulsion.
Symptom Reduction Misses the Message
The dominant clinical approach of limiting triggers and redirecting attention has value, but applied in isolation it risks overlooking what persistent daydreams are communicating about unmet needs.
Fantasy Content Points to Real Needs
Recurring themes — love, recognition, safety, strength — map onto specific unmet needs; the young doctor dreaming of awards may simply hunger for acknowledgement from those close to him.
Stay in Dialogue, Don’t Banish Dreams
The goal is not to extinguish daydreams but to remain in conversation with them — asking what the fantasy needs and what would need to change in real life for it to lose its hold.
Master Reading Comprehension
Practice with 365 curated articles and 2,400+ questions across 9 RC types.
Article Analysis
Breaking Down the Elements
Main Idea
Daydreams Are Signals, Not Symptoms to Suppress
Bharuchi’s central claim is that mind-wandering—even in its most disruptive forms—carries meaningful content pointing to real unmet needs. Rather than treating daydreams purely as failures of attention control, she argues that attending to their recurring themes is a more humane and effective path. The goal is not to silence the inner life, but to hear what it is asking for.
Purpose
To Reframe, Critique, and Offer a Practical Alternative
Bharuchi writes with three simultaneous purposes: to reframe daydreaming from liability to diagnostic signal; to critique the dominant clinical model of symptom reduction as insufficient; and to equip any reader—not only those with clinical conditions—with a reflective practice they can actually use. The article is therapeutic in intent without being prescriptive in tone.
Structure
Narrative Hook → Research Context → Clinical Critique → Reflective Practice → Case Study → Call to Dialogue
The article opens and closes with Nida—a framing device that gives the clinical argument a human face. Between these bookends, Bharuchi moves from research statistics through the spectrum of MD, critiques existing treatment, proposes an alternative, and illustrates it with an anonymised case. This circular structure reinforces the article’s own thesis: return to the story to understand its meaning.
Tone
Compassionate, Measured & Clinically Grounded
Bharuchi’s tone is consistently compassionate—she never pathologises the patients she describes, and she addresses the reader directly with warmth (“whatever kind of daydreamer you are”). The language is clinical enough to establish authority but never coldly technical. There is a quiet advocacy running throughout: for paying attention, for honouring inner experience, and for sitting with discomfort rather than suppressing it.
Key Terms
Vocabulary from the Article
Click each card to reveal the definition
Build your vocabulary systematically
Each article in our course includes 8-12 vocabulary words with contextual usage.
Tough Words
Challenging Vocabulary
Tap each card to flip and see the definition
The state of being likely to be influenced or harmed by a particular condition; a vulnerability or predisposition toward something.
“…factors such as attentional regulation and high fantasy-proneness can increase susceptibility to immersive inner lives.”
The state of lacking something considered necessary for wellbeing — in this article, an emotional or relational need that has gone unmet.
“Paying attention to the mind-wandering without addressing the underlying deprivation leaves the need intact.”
Characterised by chronically elevated dopamine activity in the brain, proposed as a possible biological contributor to immersive or compulsive fantasy states.
“…there may be biological contributors, particularly among those with ‘hyperdopaminergic’ brains that experience chronically elevated dopamine activity.”
Resulting from an irresistible urge that is difficult to control; in maladaptive daydreaming, fantasy becomes compulsive when it overrides conscious intention to stop.
“…a pattern of excessive, compulsive fantasy that can interfere with daily work, study, relationships or self-care.”
Difficult or painful circumstances, especially those experienced during formative periods; early emotional adversity is consistently linked to maladaptive daydreaming.
“MD is consistently linked to early emotional adversity, and many individuals report histories of loneliness, bullying, trauma, neglect or chronic stress.”
The state of being satisfied and having one’s needs or desires met; the article identifies fantasy becoming the “only reliable site of fulfilment” as a marker of problematic daydreaming.
“…problems arise when imagination becomes the only reliable site of fulfilment.”
Reading Comprehension
Test Your Understanding
5 questions covering different RC question types
1According to the article, maladaptive daydreaming (MD) has been formally recognised as a disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.
2What does the author identify as the key limitation of the dominant clinical approach to maladaptive daydreaming?
3Which sentence best captures the author’s overall conclusion about the relationship between daydreaming and psychological need?
4Evaluate the following statements about mind-wandering and its effects based on the article.
Drifting thoughts can negatively affect attention, mood, memory, and academic performance.
Two individuals with identical psychological profiles will always daydream about the same kinds of themes.
Imagined perspectives in daydreams can support moral reasoning and social understanding.
Select True or False for all three statements, then click “Check Answers”
5In the clinical case described, the author says the therapy goal was “not to recreate the fantasy in reality” but to “honour its message through small, grounded gestures.” What can be most reasonably inferred from this distinction?
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Maladaptive daydreaming (MD) is a pattern of excessive, compulsive fantasy that interferes with daily work, study, relationships, or self-care. The term was coined by clinical psychologist Eli Somer. Unlike ordinary daydreaming, MD involves elaborate inner lives that feel more compelling than everyday reality. It is not yet formally recognised in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, and its clinical boundaries remain contested. Research links it to ADHD, OCD, and dissociative symptoms.
Bharuchi outlines a three-step reflective practice: first, notice the triggers and context of mind-wandering — what happened just before the mind drifted? Second, attend to the emotions and roles within the fantasy — what feeling is the dream providing that is otherwise absent from waking life? Third, examine the central themes. If the daydream centres on friendship, it may signal a need for relational repair; if on competence or visibility, it may point to a need for genuine recognition in one’s daily environment.
The article describes childhood adversity as the most consistent precursor to MD. Children who experience loneliness, bullying, trauma, neglect, or chronic stress may turn to imagined worlds as a way to find comfort, recover control, and escape pain. What begins as harmless distraction can deepen into something more entrenched. The seeds of compulsive fantasy are frequently sown before adolescence, which is why therapy often involves working through the needs of that earlier self.
Readlite provides curated articles with comprehensive analysis including summaries, key points, vocabulary building, and practice questions across 9 different RC question types. Our Ultimate Reading Course offers 365 articles with 2,400+ questions to systematically improve your reading comprehension skills.
This article is rated Advanced. It combines clinical psychology terminology (maladaptive daydreaming, dissociative symptoms, attentional regulation, hyperdopaminergic) with nuanced argumentation that requires readers to track a multi-step critique of existing treatment models. The circular narrative structure—opening and closing on Nida—and the integration of research, case study, and therapeutic practice demand close, inferential reading well beyond a straightforward informational text.
Vardah Bharuchi is a psychological associate and child psychologist practising at a hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Her perspective is significant because it bridges clinical practice in a non-Western context with international psychological research — a combination rarely seen in mainstream psychology writing. Her first-person clinical observations of patients in Karachi ground the article’s theoretical claims in lived, culturally specific experience, lending the argument both authority and compassion.
The Ultimate Reading Course covers 9 RC question types: Multiple Choice, True/False, Multi-Statement T/F, Text Highlight, Fill in the Blanks, Matching, Sequencing, Error Spotting, and Short Answer. This comprehensive coverage prepares you for any reading comprehension format you might encounter.
