Why It’s Time to Rethink the Notion of an Autism ‘Spectrum’
Why Read This
What Makes This Article Worth Your Time
Summary
What This Article Is About
Autism expert Aimee Grant challenges the widespread use of the term “autism spectrum,” coined by Dr. Lorna Wing in the 1980s. While groundbreaking at the time, the linear spectrum metaphor misleadingly suggests autistic people can be ranked from “more autistic” to “less autistic.” In reality, autism comprises diverse traits—stimming, monotropism, routine dependence, and hypermobility—appearing in unique combinations that defy simple categorization.
Grant critiques diagnostic systems like the American Psychiatric Association’s three-level classification and recent proposals for “profound autism,” arguing they fail to capture how support needs fluctuate with life circumstances like burnout or menopause. She warns that hierarchical thinking risks dehumanizing autistic people with higher support needs, particularly amid concerning political rhetoric. The article advocates for moving beyond spectrum language toward recognizing autism as a difference rather than a defect.
Key Points
Main Takeaways
The Linear Metaphor Fails
The spectrum concept wrongly suggests a straight line from “mild” to “severe,” when autism actually involves diverse traits in unique combinations.
Diagnostic Levels Are Inadequate
The three-level support classification system is vague, inconsistently applied, and fails to reflect real-world experiences or changing needs.
Support Needs Fluctuate
Life circumstances like burnout or menopause can increase support requirements, making static classifications fundamentally inadequate for capturing lived reality.
Historical Legacy Creates Problems
Asperger’s syndrome terminology, drawn from a physician associated with Nazi-era genocide, demonstrates how diagnostic language carries harmful historical baggage.
Hierarchies Risk Dehumanization
Ranking autistic people creates dangerous judgments about societal value, potentially fueling harmful political agendas targeting those with higher support needs.
Language Shapes Treatment
Moving from “on the spectrum” to direct language like “autistic” recognizes autism as a difference rather than defect, influencing societal acceptance.
Master Reading Comprehension
Practice with 365 curated articles and 2,400+ questions across 9 RC types.
Article Analysis
Breaking Down the Elements
Main Idea
Beyond Linear Thinking
The autism spectrum metaphor, while historically groundbreaking, has become misleading and potentially harmful because it suggests a linear ranking of severity when autism actually manifests as diverse, multidimensional traits appearing in unique combinations that resist simple categorization and change over time.
Purpose
To Advocate for Conceptual Change
Grant seeks to challenge entrenched medical and cultural frameworks around autism diagnosis and terminology. She aims to persuade readers that outdated language perpetuates harmful hierarchies and that moving toward more nuanced, respectful terminology could improve how society values and supports autistic people.
Structure
Historical Context → Critique → Ethical Warning
The article begins by contextualizing Dr. Lorna Wing’s groundbreaking work, transitions into systematic critique of current diagnostic frameworks and terminology (spectrum, levels, profound autism), then escalates to ethical concerns about dehumanization and political dangers before concluding with advocacy for linguistic and conceptual reform.
Tone
Critical, Concerned & Advocacy-Driven
Grant maintains an authoritative yet accessible voice, balancing scientific critique with ethical urgency. The tone becomes progressively more concerned when discussing historical atrocities and contemporary political threats, ultimately adopting an advocacy stance that emphasizes respect, dignity, and the importance of linguistic precision in shaping societal attitudes.
Key Terms
Vocabulary from the Article
Click each card to reveal the definition
Build your vocabulary systematically
Each article in our course includes 8-12 vocabulary words with contextual usage.
Tough Words
Challenging Vocabulary
Tap each card to flip and see the definition
Pioneering or innovative in a way that fundamentally changes understanding or opens new possibilities in a field.
“At the time, her ‘autism spectrum’ concept was groundbreaking. Instead of seeing autism as a rare, narrowly defined condition, she recognised a wide range of traits.”
To remain useful or relevant beyond a certain point; to survive longer than something’s original purpose or value.
“And some autism experts, including me, argue the term has outlived its usefulness.”
In a manner that varies unpredictably or lacks uniformity; not applied or functioning in the same way across situations.
“But there is research that argues these levels are vague and inconsistently applied.”
The deliberate and systematic destruction of a group of people based on ethnicity, nationality, religion, or other defining characteristics.
“During the Nazi period, Asperger was associated with a genocide of autistic people with higher support needs.”
Proven to be false or wrong through evidence and argument; disproven or contradicted convincingly.
“So far, this has included strongly refuted claims that paracetamol use in pregnancy is linked to autism in children.”
Difficult to believe; unlikely or implausible, though not necessarily impossible.
“This may seem far fetched, but the political direction in the US, for example, is very worrying to many autistic people.”
Reading Comprehension
Test Your Understanding
5 questions covering different RC question types
1Dr. Lorna Wing’s concept of an autism spectrum was immediately recognized as problematic when she introduced it in the 1980s.
2According to the article, what is the main problem with the American Psychiatric Association’s three-level autism classification system?
3Which sentence best explains why autism cannot be represented as a single linear spectrum?
4Based on the article, evaluate these statements about the historical context of autism terminology:
The term “Asperger’s syndrome” is still widely preferred by most autistic people today.
Hans Asperger was associated with Nazi-era genocide targeting autistic people with higher support needs.
The label “profound autism” has been criticized for not providing information about specific challenges or support types needed.
Select True or False for all three statements, then click “Check Answers”
5Why does the author warn that hierarchical categorization of autistic people carries political dangers?
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Neurodivergent describes individuals whose brain functions differ from what society considers typical or “neurotypical.” Autism is one form of neurodivergence, but the term encompasses other conditions like ADHD, dyslexia, and various learning differences. The concept recognizes that these differences represent natural variations in human neurology rather than defects or disorders requiring correction. Many autistic people prefer neurodivergent terminology because it emphasizes difference over deficiency and acknowledges that diverse cognitive styles have value rather than representing deviations from a single “correct” way of thinking.
Autism comprises multiple independent traits—stimming, monotropism, routine dependence, sensory sensitivities, hypermobility—that appear in unique combinations for each individual. Someone might have intense focus capabilities but struggle with sensory overload, or require routine in some areas while being flexible in others. These multidimensional characteristics cannot be reduced to a single line measuring “more” or “less” autistic. Additionally, support needs fluctuate with circumstances like burnout, menopause, or environmental factors, making any static ranking fundamentally inadequate for capturing autism’s complex, evolving reality across different contexts and life stages.
While often well-meaning, avoiding the word “autistic” reinforces the idea that autism is inherently negative—something to be euphemized rather than stated directly. Many autistic adults prefer straightforward language because it treats autism as a neutral descriptor of identity rather than a shameful condition requiring softer terminology. Using direct language like “autistic person” or “autistic adult” normalizes autism as one aspect of human diversity. The avoidance of clear terminology can paradoxically perpetuate stigma by suggesting autism is too negative to name directly, when the goal should be accepting autism as a difference rather than defect.
Readlite provides curated articles with comprehensive analysis including summaries, key points, vocabulary building, and practice questions across 9 different RC question types. Our Ultimate Reading Course offers 365 articles with 2,400+ questions to systematically improve your reading comprehension skills.
This article is rated Intermediate level. It introduces specialized terminology like neurodivergent, stimming, and monotropism while discussing complex social and ethical issues around diagnostic classification and historical context. The article requires readers to understand nuanced arguments about language, follow multi-layered critiques of medical frameworks, and grasp ethical implications of categorization systems. While accessible to general readers with interest in psychology or social issues, it demands engagement with abstract concepts about how terminology shapes societal attitudes and the political implications of medical classification systems.
Hans Asperger’s association with Nazi-era genocide targeting autistic people with higher support needs demonstrates how diagnostic terminology carries historical weight and ethical implications. Using language derived from someone involved in systematic murder perpetuates harmful legacies and causes pain to autistic communities aware of this history. The example illustrates the article’s broader argument that seemingly neutral medical classifications aren’t value-free—they can encode hierarchies that rank human worth. Understanding this history helps explain why many autistic people reject certain terminologies and why advocates emphasize the need for language that respects dignity rather than reinforcing historical patterns of dehumanization.
The Ultimate Reading Course covers 9 RC question types: Multiple Choice, True/False, Multi-Statement T/F, Text Highlight, Fill in the Blanks, Matching, Sequencing, Error Spotting, and Short Answer. This comprehensive coverage prepares you for any reading comprehension format you might encounter.
