We criminalise the political stunt at our peril. It is a crucial art form that is impossible to ignore
Why Read This
What Makes This Article Worth Your Time
Summary
What This Article Is About
Mark Borkowski argues that contemporary Britain celebrates historical protesters like suffragettes and Greenham Common women while criminalizing today’s activists through repressive laws enforced by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper. Drawing on research for his BBC Radio 4 documentary Outrage Inc, Borkowski reframes political stunts as sophisticated art forms—”theatre with consequences”—rather than chaos, demonstrating how suffragettes “hacked the algorithm” by exploiting Edwardian newspapers’ circulation wars, Greenham women sustained decade-long “rolling installations,” and Peter Tatchell transformed personal suffering into testimony through citizen’s arrests and confrontations.
Contemporary examples include the Yes Men’s 2004 Bhopal hoax on BBC World, Germany’s Centre for Political Beauty building Holocaust memorials outside far-right politicians’ homes, and Led By Donkeys weaponizing politicians’ own words through giant projections and their Covid memorial wall. Borkowski identifies a consistent pattern: protests initially demonized by conservatives are later rehabilitated as heritage once successful. He warns that current restrictions on groups like Palestine Action and Extinction Rebellion threaten the creative, risky tactics that historically forced social change, concluding that “the stunt is never a sideshow” but “the main act of change.”
Key Points
Main Takeaways
Historical Protest Paradox
Britain celebrates past protesters like suffragettes while Home Secretary Yvette Cooper wears commemorative sashes yet presides over laws that would imprison them today.
Stunts as Strategic Art
Political stunts represent sophisticated “theatre with consequences”—storyboarded, narrative-driven productions designed to provoke, timed to perfection, impossible to ignore.
Suffragettes “Hacked the Algorithm”
Emmeline Pankhurst exploited Edwardian circulation wars—smashing windows and torching postboxes knowing “SUFFRAGETTE OUTRAGE” headlines would force issues into every British parlour.
Contemporary “Mind Bombs”
Led By Donkeys weaponizes politicians’ own words through projections; the Yes Men’s Bhopal hoax crashed Dow’s stock; Germany’s Centre for Political Beauty builds Holocaust memorials outside far-right homes.
Rehabilitation Cycle Pattern
Protests initially demonized are later rehabilitated—suffragettes once branded terrorists are now national heroines; Greenham women once derided as cranks now honored for foresight.
Democratic Crossroads Warning
Britain faces choice between neutering protest into stage-managed civility or acknowledging that transformative change has always required outrageous, risky, profoundly creative acts.
Master Reading Comprehension
Practice with 365 curated articles and 2,400+ questions across 9 RC types.
Article Analysis
Breaking Down the Elements
Main Idea
Protest as Essential Democratic Art
The article establishes that effective political protest constitutes sophisticated artistic production—”theatre with consequences”—requiring strategic planning, narrative construction, and media manipulation expertise. By demonstrating how suffragettes, Greenham women, and contemporary activists deliberately exploit media economies to force uncomfortable issues into public consciousness, Borkowski argues that disruptive, creative protest represents democracy’s immune system rather than pathology, making its criminalization a threat to democratic renewal itself.
Purpose
Defending Disruptive Activism
Borkowski aims to reframe political stunts from criminal chaos to legitimate democratic action by establishing historical continuity between celebrated past protesters and condemned present activists. By revealing the sophisticated strategic thinking behind apparently spontaneous outrage, he seeks to undermine calls for protest criminalization while providing intellectual ammunition for defenders of groups like Palestine Action and Extinction Rebellion, ultimately warning that restricting creative protest threatens the mechanism through which democratic societies address injustice.
Structure
Provocative Question → Historical Analysis → Contemporary Examples → Warning
Opens with rhetorical question about how suffragettes would be treated today, establishes the paradox of celebrating past protesters while criminalizing current ones, analyzes historical tactics (suffragettes exploiting circulation wars, Greenham creating rolling installations, Tatchell embodying suffering), provides contemporary parallels (Yes Men, Centre for Political Beauty, Led By Donkeys), identifies the rehabilitation cycle pattern, and concludes with urgent warning about democratic stakes. The progression moves from historical legitimization through tactical analysis to present-day application.
Tone
Passionate, Scholarly & Provocatively Reverent
Borkowski combines PR professional expertise with academic historical analysis while maintaining passionate advocacy for protest rights. His tone balances reverence for historical activists with contemporary urgency, using vivid metaphors (“mind bombs,” “hacked the algorithm,” “moral Boudiccas”) to make tactical analysis accessible. The writing shifts between analytical distance when examining protest mechanics and moral indignation when confronting governmental hypocrisy, concluding with near-manifesto urgency about democratic stakes without abandoning professional credibility.
Key Terms
Vocabulary from the Article
Click each card to reveal the definition
Build your vocabulary systematically
Each article in our course includes 8-12 vocabulary words with contextual usage.
Tough Words
Challenging Vocabulary
Tap each card to flip and see the definition
Women who campaigned for the right to vote in Britain in the early 20th century, often using militant tactics including arson and window-smashing.
“With their matchsticks, they weren’t vandals—they were master tacticians who understood the media economy of Edwardian Britain.”
Reference to the ancient British Celtic queen who led a rebellion against Roman occupation; used here to describe fierce, principled female warriors.
“The Greenham women weren’t eccentrics, either. They were moral Boudiccas who turned protest into performance art on a national scale.”
To plan or visualize a sequence of events in advance, typically by creating a series of panels showing key moments; to pre-plan strategic actions.
“Those who stage them aren’t amateurs: they storyboard, construct narrative, marshal resources.”
Created or performed spontaneously without preparation; done extemporaneously in response to circumstances rather than following a plan.
“Some of it was planned, some improvised, but its genius lay in persistence.”
Impossible to ignore or overlook; so prominent, significant, or persistent that it demands attention and cannot be dismissed.
“Its answer was unignorable concrete, a daily reminder that history isn’t a wound to be closed for convenience.”
Members of irregular military groups using unconventional tactics; metaphorically, activists employing surprise, mobility, and asymmetric strategies against established power.
“And then there’s Led By Donkeys, the post-Brexit guerrillas.”
Reading Comprehension
Test Your Understanding
5 questions covering different RC question types
1According to Borkowski, the suffragettes’ window-smashing and arson were spontaneous acts of anger rather than calculated media tactics.
2What makes the Greenham Common women’s protest particularly effective according to Borkowski’s analysis?
3Select the sentence that best captures Borkowski’s concern about the historical pattern of protest reception.
4Evaluate whether each statement about Led By Donkeys’ tactics is supported by the article.
Led By Donkeys weaponizes politicians’ own words by replaying them until they expose hypocrisy.
Their tactics include giant projections on parliament and Boris Johnson’s lies displayed on Dover cliffs.
Borkowski criticizes Led By Donkeys for creating stunts for novelty’s sake rather than substantive political engagement.
Select True or False for all three statements, then click “Check Answers”
5What can be inferred about why Borkowski emphasizes that political stunts are “art forms” rather than simply effective tactics?
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
In early 1900s Britain, newspapers like the Daily Mail and Daily Express competed in circulation wars, selling millions of copies at a penny each through advertising-funded business models that required sensational content. The suffragettes understood that respectful speeches didn’t sell papers, but outrage did. By smashing Bond Street windows and torching postboxes, they guaranteed “SUFFRAGETTE OUTRAGE” headlines that forced their issues into every parlour. Using modern terminology, Borkowski says they “hacked the algorithm”—they exploited the media attention economy’s structural logic to amplify their message, just as contemporary activists manipulate social media algorithms for visibility.
In 2004, the Yes Men posed as Dow Chemical executives on BBC World, announcing a fictional $12 billion compensation package for Bhopal disaster victims. This wasn’t chaos but “conviction armed with wit”—a calculated intervention exposing corporate indifference by temporarily creating the justice victims deserved. Dow’s share price plummeting before the hoax’s exposure demonstrated how their “mind bomb detonated live on air” revealed market values prioritizing profit over human suffering. The stunt combined technical execution (convincing BBC producers), symbolic power (imagining justice), and economic impact (stock market response), exemplifying Borkowski’s thesis that effective protest requires sophisticated production skills.
Borkowski calls them “moral Boudiccas” by comparing them to the ancient Celtic queen who led rebellion against Roman occupation—fierce, principled female warriors fighting imperial power. The Greenham women transformed protest into “performance art on a national scale” through their decade-long peace camp at the nuclear missile base, using tents, banners, wire-cutting, and missile silo dancing as “a rolling installation” that sustained media attention. Their genius lay not in single dramatic acts but in persistence—constantly reframing their story so cameras always had content and the public always had something to discuss, demonstrating how sustained creative resistance can challenge military-industrial power.
Readlite provides curated articles with comprehensive analysis including summaries, key points, vocabulary building, and practice questions across 9 different RC question types. Our Ultimate Reading Course offers 365 articles with 2,400+ questions to systematically improve your reading comprehension skills.
This is an Advanced-level article requiring understanding of political philosophy, historical patterns, and rhetorical strategy. Readers must track arguments across historical periods (suffragettes, Greenham women, contemporary activists), recognize conceptual frameworks (protest as art, media economy exploitation, rehabilitation cycles), interpret metaphorical language (“hacked the algorithm,” “mind bombs,” “moral Boudiccas”), and understand how Borkowski uses historical analysis to make contemporary political arguments. Success requires recognizing tactical parallels across different protest movements, understanding media attention economics, and grasping how framing protest as “art” challenges criminalization—synthesizing cultural criticism, political advocacy, and historical analysis simultaneously.
This exemplifies the article’s central paradox: Britain celebrates historical protesters while criminalizing contemporary ones. Cooper, as Home Secretary presiding over “repressive laws and mass arrests,” wearing a commemorative suffragette sash represents profound hypocrisy—honoring women who would be imprisoned under her own policies. Borkowski uses this image to demonstrate how societies conveniently forget that celebrated historical movements were equally disruptive and illegal when active. The paradox reveals how power selectively rehabilitates past dissent while crushing present resistance, suggesting that today’s criminalized activists will likely become tomorrow’s honored heroes once their causes succeed, making current criminalization both hypocritical and historically myopic.
The Ultimate Reading Course covers 9 RC question types: Multiple Choice, True/False, Multi-Statement T/F, Text Highlight, Fill in the Blanks, Matching, Sequencing, Error Spotting, and Short Answer. This comprehensive coverage prepares you for any reading comprehension format you might encounter.
