How Money Evolved From Shells and Coins to Apps and Bitcoin

The double coincidence of wants describes the fundamental problem with barter systems: traders must find someone who simultaneously has what they want and wants what they have. According to the evolutionary narrative Maurer describes, this difficulty beset primordial traders who couldn’t find willing trading partners, leading to money’s invention as a universally accepted medium of exchange. However, Maurer presents this not as historical fact but as part of a “just-so story” used to justify money’s existence. The narrative assumes isolated communities gradually developing trade, but anthropological evidence suggests money emerged through different mechanisms—often through social obligations, tribute systems, or administrative states rather than merchant frustration with barter inefficiency.

Developed world systems typically use NFC (near-field communication) or RFID chips that enable tap-and-go payments on smartphones, leveraging familiarity from transit systems. Developing world systems rely on less visible infrastructure: SIM card programs, SMS (short message service) familiar from texting, and USSD (unstructured supplementary service data) protocol requiring special codes to establish secure server connections. These technologies work on low-end feature phones, which remained the global majority even after smartphones overtook them in 2013. The developing world approach offers device and carrier independence—theoretically allowing money transfers between any phone on any network—though some mobile operators resist this to build exclusive customer bases. Maurer emphasizes these technological differences reveal infrastructure complexity the evolutionary narrative obscures.

Maurer argues that efficiency isn’t always desirable—we want to slow down transactions to mark special relationships. When giving gifts, people convert cash or credit into silver dollars for children, send checks in cards, or purchase store-specific gift cards precisely because these forms are less convertible, less liquid, and less efficient than cash. This deliberate inefficiency signals the gift’s special quality and differentiates it from ordinary transactions. The practice contradicts the evolutionary narrative’s assumption that newer, more efficient payment forms are always superior. Instead, it demonstrates how people actively choose different money forms to express different social relationships. “Efficiency” isn’t universal progress—it’s context-dependent, and sometimes we prefer slower, more meaningful exchanges that require savoring the act of giving and receiving.

Readlite provides curated articles with comprehensive analysis including summaries, key points, vocabulary building, and practice questions across 9 different RC question types. Our Ultimate Reading Course offers 365 articles with 2,400+ questions to systematically improve your reading comprehension skills.

This article is rated Advanced level. Maurer assumes familiarity with economic concepts (barter, commodity money, gold standard), philosophical distinctions (intrinsic value versus convention), and theoretical frameworks (technological determinism, social constructivism). The piece moves fluidly between concrete examples (PayPal advertisements, SIM cards) and abstract arguments about money’s ontological status as relationship rather than object. Understanding requires tracking a sustained critique across multiple dimensions—marketing ideology, historical narratives, infrastructure invisibility, and relational philosophy—while integrating technical details about SMS protocols and regulatory frameworks. The sophisticated interweaving of anthropology, economics, technology studies, and philosophy demands conceptual agility. However, Maurer’s accessible prose and concrete examples make complex ideas graspable for motivated readers willing to engage carefully with theoretical nuance.

When Maurer states that paper dollars “indexed a vast and powerful apparatus for creating, assigning, managing and distributing the collective wealth,” he means money points to or represents this infrastructure without being reducible to it. The term “index” comes from semiotics—an index is a sign connected to its referent through direct physical or causal relationship (like smoke indexing fire). Dollar bills aren’t merely paper; they’re material markers indicating the existence of complex technological, legal, regulatory, organizational, and communicative systems that make money functional. Without this apparatus—governments, central banks, regulatory frameworks, consumer protections, payment networks—the paper becomes worthless, as post-apocalyptic movie jokes illustrate. Understanding money requires seeing both the visible token and the invisible infrastructure it indexes, which evolutionary narratives systematically obscure.

The Ultimate Reading Course covers 9 RC question types: Multiple Choice, True/False, Multi-Statement T/F, Text Highlight, Fill in the Blanks, Matching, Sequencing, Error Spotting, and Short Answer. This comprehensive coverage prepares you for any reading comprehension format you might encounter.