I’ve seen how the justice system is crumbling. Why doesn’t the government take action?
Why Read This
What Makes This Article Worth Your Time
Summary
What This Article Is About
Dominic Grieve, drawing on four decades of legal experience beginning in the early 1980s, chronicles the deterioration of Britain’s justice infrastructure from its Victorian inadequacy through a brief period of optimism to its current state of crisis. He recounts working as a barrister funded by legal aid, traveling across London and southeast England to courts that struggled with outdated facilities, before witnessing the opening of Maidstone’s new court centre—a building the Queen herself inaugurated, emphasizing justice as the state’s essential first social service.
The Maidstone court, championed by Judge John Streeter, represented a vision of what effective justice delivery could achieve: adequate courtrooms, client consultation spaces, and professional amenities that fostered both efficiency and high standards. Officials from the Lord Chancellor’s Department praised it as an exemplar for the future. Grieve’s narrative implicitly contrasts this hopeful moment with subsequent decades of decline, questioning why government has failed to sustain this commitment to justice infrastructure despite its fundamental importance to the rule of law.
Key Points
Main Takeaways
Victorian Infrastructure Inadequacy
Courts in the 1980s operated in Victorian buildings that lacked essential facilities to handle modern criminal and civil caseloads effectively.
Justice as Essential Service
The Queen’s coronation oath framed justice provision as the state’s fundamental social service, preceding all other governmental responsibilities.
Maidstone as Model
The new Maidstone court centre demonstrated how proper infrastructure—consultation rooms, professional facilities—could enhance both efficiency and justice delivery standards.
Legal Aid Foundation
Grieve’s early practice relied on publicly funded legal aid for criminal and family cases, establishing access to justice for those who couldn’t afford private representation.
Professional Collaboration Spaces
Bar mess facilities enabled barristers to consult colleagues, resolve disputes privately, and maintain professional standards—infrastructure that supported justice quality.
Governmental Abandonment Question
Despite recognizing Maidstone as an exemplar for future court design, government has failed to sustain investment in justice infrastructure over subsequent decades.
Master Reading Comprehension
Practice with 365 curated articles and 2,400+ questions across 9 RC types.
Article Analysis
Breaking Down the Elements
Main Idea
Infrastructural Decline as Justice Crisis
Grieve argues that Britain’s justice system has regressed from a brief period of infrastructural investment and optimism to a state of deterioration that fundamentally undermines the delivery of justice. The contrast between Maidstone’s promise and subsequent governmental neglect illustrates how physical infrastructure directly affects institutional effectiveness and access to justice.
Purpose
Advocacy Through Historical Witness
The article functions as both personal testimony and political advocacy, using Grieve’s four-decade career perspective to validate his critique of current justice policy. By establishing his credibility through lived experience and invoking the Queen’s constitutional framing of justice as the state’s primary obligation, he challenges government to explain its abandonment of infrastructure investment.
Structure
Chronological Narrative → Exemplar Case Study → Implicit Critique
Grieve begins with his 1980s experience in inadequate Victorian courts to establish baseline conditions, then extensively details Maidstone as a concrete example of what proper investment achieved, before ending with an unanswered question that transforms the historical account into implicit condemnation of current policy. The structure moves from problem to solution to abandonment.
Reflective, Disappointed & Questioning
Grieve writes with the measured authority of professional experience rather than polemical outrage, yet his disappointment permeates the contrast between past promise and implied present failure. The concluding question—”Why doesn’t the government take action?”—conveys bewilderment at policy choices that contradict both constitutional principle and demonstrated best practice.
Key Terms
Vocabulary from the Article
Click each card to reveal the definition
Build your vocabulary systematically
Each article in our course includes 8-12 vocabulary words with contextual usage.
Tough Words
Challenging Vocabulary
Tap each card to flip and see the definition
A lawyer in England and Wales who specializes in courtroom advocacy and litigation, as distinct from a solicitor who handles legal matters outside court.
“When I first started at the bar in the early 1980s, my practice was largely publicly funded by legal aid.”
Relating to the period of Queen Victoria’s reign (1837-1901); often used to describe buildings from that era, which may be ornate but lack modern facilities.
“Most of these buildings were Victorian and lacked the facilities to cope with the growing volume of criminal and civil cases.”
The action of supplying or making available something necessary; in this context, the delivery and administration of justice services by the state.
“She spoke of how the provision of justice was the essential first ‘social service’ provided by the state.”
A meeting for discussion or advice; in legal contexts, private meetings between lawyers and clients to discuss case strategy and provide counsel.
“There were many more courts; rooms for consultations with clients; and a bar mess.”
A person or party competing against or contesting another; in legal practice, the opposing counsel representing the other side in a case.
“…there was the privacy to get advice from colleagues and to resolve issues with one’s opponent.”
Disintegrating or breaking down gradually; deteriorating in quality, structure, or effectiveness over time through neglect or inadequate maintenance.
“I’ve seen how the justice system is crumbling. Why doesn’t the government take action?”
Reading Comprehension
Test Your Understanding
5 questions covering different RC question types
1According to the article, Grieve’s early legal practice was primarily funded by private clients rather than legal aid.
2What did the Queen emphasize when opening the Maidstone court centre?
3Which sentence best describes the specific infrastructure improvements at Maidstone court centre?
4Evaluate these statements about Grieve’s account of court infrastructure:
Victorian court buildings lacked adequate facilities to handle the volume of cases in the 1980s.
The bar mess at Maidstone provided space for professional consultation and informal dispute resolution.
Judge Streeter worked for the Lord Chancellor’s Department before becoming resident judge at Maidstone.
Select True or False for all three statements, then click “Check Answers”
5What can be reasonably inferred from Grieve’s contrast between Maidstone in the 1980s and his concluding question about government inaction?
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
The bar mess served multiple crucial functions beyond simply providing hot food. It created private space where barristers could consult experienced colleagues on complex legal questions, discuss case strategies away from clients and public observation, and informally resolve procedural disputes with opposing counsel before they escalated to formal motions. This professional infrastructure directly contributed to the court’s reputation for efficiency and high standards by facilitating collaboration and reducing unnecessary litigation.
This constitutional framing establishes justice provision as the state’s most fundamental obligation—more basic than healthcare, education, or any other government function. By connecting it to the coronation oath, the Queen positioned justice infrastructure not as discretionary spending but as a core constitutional duty. Grieve invokes this to highlight the contradiction between the state’s foundational responsibility and its subsequent abandonment of investment, making governmental neglect not just poor policy but a betrayal of constitutional principle.
Victorian-era court buildings, while architecturally impressive, were designed for much smaller caseloads and lacked facilities that modern justice administration requires. They typically had insufficient courtrooms to handle the volume of criminal and civil cases, no dedicated spaces for confidential attorney-client consultations, inadequate waiting areas that forced victims and defendants into uncomfortable proximity, and no professional facilities for lawyers to prepare cases or collaborate. These physical limitations directly impeded the effective delivery of justice.
Readlite provides curated articles with comprehensive analysis including summaries, key points, vocabulary building, and practice questions across 9 different RC question types. Our Ultimate Reading Course offers 365 articles with 2,400+ questions to systematically improve your reading comprehension skills.
This article is classified as Advanced difficulty due to its sophisticated legal and constitutional vocabulary, implicit argumentation structure, and requirement for readers to understand the rhetorical significance of contrasts between past promise and implied present failure. It demands familiarity with British legal system terminology, ability to infer critique from narrative structure rather than explicit condemnation, and capacity to recognize how historical anecdote functions as political argument about governmental responsibility.
Dominic Grieve served as Attorney General for England and Wales (2010-2014) and as a Member of Parliament, making him one of Britain’s most senior legal officials. His four decades of experience—from legal aid barrister in the 1980s through the highest levels of government legal service—provides unique authority to assess justice system deterioration. Unlike academic critics, he witnessed the system’s evolution firsthand across multiple roles, giving his observations both professional credibility and personal authenticity that strengthens his implicit critique of governmental neglect.
The Ultimate Reading Course covers 9 RC question types: Multiple Choice, True/False, Multi-Statement T/F, Text Highlight, Fill in the Blanks, Matching, Sequencing, Error Spotting, and Short Answer. This comprehensive coverage prepares you for any reading comprehension format you might encounter.
