How to Dodge the Tourist Traps: The Economics of Hidden Fees
Why Read This
What Makes This Article Worth Your Time
Summary
What This Article Is About
Tim Harford examines why hidden fees persist in competitive markets through personal experience renting cars in Germany for Italy drop-off, encountering identical practices from both Europcar (2019) and Avis (2025)βcompanies charging mandatory Italian driving fees not disclosed during online booking. He asks why competition doesn’t eliminate such nonsense, proposing two possibilities: insufficient competition in tourist locations like Garmisch-Partenkirchen, or customers lacking sufficient savvy despite hating fee ambushes. The puzzle deepens when considering why car hire firms don’t win business by proclaiming “no hidden charges.” Harford presents Xavier Gabaix and David Laibson’s two-decade-old economic theory: such proclamations backfire because truly savvy customers prefer competitors with hidden charges they can dodge, leaving them subsidized by less-savvy “suckers.” Using Hotel UpFront versus Hotel FlyTrap analogy, he demonstrates how moderately savvy customers choose all-inclusive options while ultra-savvy ones arrange virtual SIMs, buy 7-Eleven snacks, and exploit cheap rooms at fee-heavy establishments.
This creates systemic problems beyond individual annoyance: customers may buy products they’d reject if given transparent pricing (Harford’s family might have chosen trains over cars), and even trap-spotting customers overpay because obfuscation weakens price competitionβif only few conscientious customers figure out best deals, companies lack incentive to offer genuinely good prices. Solutions include UK’s Digital Markets Competition and Consumer Act 2024 requiring transparent all-inclusive pricing, with Competition and Markets Authority guidance forbidding car-hire companies from adding compulsory local charges undisclosed at booking. Harford discusses the 2011 “midata” initiative promoting standardized machine-readable terms for banking, phones, and energy bills, allowing comparison engines to identify best providersβachieving partial success (better in banking than energy) because product complexity compounds comparison difficulties. While AI agents promise to navigate “dark patterns” and defuse booby traps, Harford remains skeptical, concluding customers will likely enact a version of the serenity prayer: wishing for savvy to spot avoidable traps, grace to accept unavoidable ones, and wisdom distinguishing between them. Failing that, “stay away from the minibar” remains sound advice.
Key Points
Main Takeaways
Hidden Fees Persist Across Companies
Harford experienced identical mandatory undisclosed charges from Europcar (2019) and Avis (2025), demonstrating systemic industry practice rather than isolated company behavior despite competitive markets.
Transparency Proclamations Backfire Paradoxically
Gabaix-Laibson theory explains why “no hidden charges” loses business: truly savvy customers prefer competitors with avoidable fees they can dodge, getting subsidized by less-savvy customers who pay.
Obfuscation Weakens Price Competition
Even trap-spotting customers overpay because misdirection reduces company incentive to offer good pricesβif only few figure out best deals, those deals needn’t be genuinely competitive.
UK Transparency Regulations Emerging
Digital Markets Competition and Consumer Act 2024 requires all-inclusive pricing; Competition and Markets Authority guidance explicitly forbids car-hire companies adding compulsory local charges undisclosed at booking.
Midata Initiative’s Mixed Success
2011 UK coalition government initiative promoted standardized machine-readable terms for banking/phones/energy bills, achieving partial successβbetter in banking than energy due to product complexity compounding comparison difficulties.
Serenity Prayer for Consumers
Despite promises of AI agents navigating dark patterns, Harford suggests customers will need savvy spotting avoidable traps, grace accepting unavoidable ones, wisdom distinguishing between themβor just avoid minibars.
Master Reading Comprehension
Practice with 365 curated articles and 2,400+ questions across 9 RC types.
Article Analysis
Breaking Down the Elements
Main Idea
Counterintuitive Economics of Price Transparency
Hidden fees persist not despite competition but because counterintuitive market dynamics where transparency paradoxically disadvantages honest companies. Gabaix-Laibson theory demonstrates “no hidden charges” proclamations backfire: truly savvy customers prefer competitors with avoidable fees, arranging virtual SIMs and 7-Eleven snacks exploiting cheap Hotel FlyTrap rooms subsidized by minibar-drainers. Creates adverse selection where all-inclusive Hotel UpFront attracts only moderately savvy customers willing to pay hefty upfront prices while fee-heavy competitors capture both unsavvy (paying everything) and ultra-savvy (dodging charges). Systemic consequence: obfuscation weakens price competitionβif only few conscientious customers figure out best deals, companies lack incentive offering genuinely competitive pricing.
Purpose
Popular Economics Explaining Policy Solutions
Explains counterintuitive economic mechanisms to general readers while advocating regulatory solutions to market failures theory predicts and experience confirms. Purpose simultaneously educational (teaching Gabaix-Laibson theory through Hotel UpFront/FlyTrap analogy) and policy-oriented (highlighting UK’s Digital Markets Competition Consumer Act 2024, Competition Markets Authority guidance). Repeated personal anecdoteβidentical Europcar 2019 and Avis 2025 experiencesβestablishes credibility through lived experience, demonstrates systematic problems, maintains engaging narrative preventing academic dryness. Functions as consumer education empowering readers with understanding rather than just coping strategies, ultimately arguing systemic problems require regulatory intervention because market forces alone won’t eliminate practices serving companies’ interests despite harming aggregate welfare.
Structure
Personal Anecdote β Economic Puzzle β Theory β Policy Solutions β Realistic Assessment
Opens vivid personal experienceβAvis Garmisch-Partenkirchen revealing mandatory undisclosed Italian driving chargesβnoting dΓ©jΓ vu: identical Europcar 2019, “Different company, same trick.” Establishes puzzle: why doesn’t competition eliminate such practices? Presents two possibilities before focusing on intriguing second: if everyone hates fee ambushes, why don’t companies win proclaiming transparency? Middle sections introduce Gabaix-Laibson’s counterintuitive answer through accessible Hotel analogy explaining how savvy customers prefer dodging fees over paying upfront. After establishing theoretical mechanism, pivots to solutions: UK regulations, midata initiative’s partial success. Conclusion maintains realistic skepticism about AI agents, ending with adapted serenity prayer and minibar advice acknowledging systemic problems persist despite regulatory efforts.
Tone
Wry Humor Balancing Frustration and Analysis
Maintains bemused, self-deprecating toneβwhen Avis demands extra fees, “My wife’s blood started to boil. I started to chuckle and take notes”βpositioning himself as both frustrated consumer and curious economist finding professional material in personal annoyance. Employs vivid accessible language making economic concepts entertaining: companies “lure suckers,” truly savvy customers get “subsidised by suckers.” Uses parenthetical humor effectively while maintaining analytical rigor explaining Gabaix-Laibson theory. Becomes earnest discussing systemic consequences and policy solutions before returning to wry skepticism about AI agents. Tonal balanceβfrustrated enough validating reader experiences, analytical enough explaining mechanisms, humorous enough remaining engaging, realistic enough acknowledging persistent problemsβcreates accessible economic education neither condescending nor oversimplifying.
Key Terms
Vocabulary from the Article
Click each card to reveal the definition
Build your vocabulary systematically
Each article in our course includes 8-12 vocabulary words with contextual usage.
Tough Words
Challenging Vocabulary
Tap each card to flip and see the definition
The action of making something deliberately unclear, obscure, or unintelligible; bewilderment or confusion intended to prevent clear understanding or conceal truth.
“Even a customer who spots every trap and jumps through every hoop may find themselves paying too much. This is because all the obfuscation and misdirection weaken the incentive for any company to offer a good price.”
Characterized by careful attention to detail and thoroughness; diligent, meticulous, and having a strong sense of duty in performing tasks.
“If only a handful of customers are conscientious enough to figure out the best deal, they may find that the best deal wasn’t really worth figuring out anyway.”
Peculiar or distinctive to an individual; having unusual characteristics, habits, or behavioral patterns that set someone or something uniquely apart.
“But take more idiosyncratic products, or one-off purchases, and the complexities compound. Where and when did you want to drive that car?”
Financially supported; having costs reduced through payments from others, allowing lower prices for beneficiaries than would otherwise be economically sustainable.
“A truly savvy one will arrange for a virtual SIM, drop in at the local 7-Eleven to pick up a cold beer and some snacks, then stay in Hotel FlyTrap, their cheap room subsidised by the suckers.”
Possible to do easily or conveniently; capable of being accomplished or brought about; practicable and realistic given available resources and constraints.
“One straightforward approach is to insist on transparent, all-inclusive pricing wherever feasible.”
The quality of being suitable for comparison; having sufficient similarity, standardization, or common features that enable meaningful evaluation of differences and similarities.
“In an ideal world products and services would be sold with maximum comparability. I should be able to ask a price comparison website or even a digital agent to take my requirements, search the web, and return with the best deals.”
Reading Comprehension
Test Your Understanding
5 questions covering different RC question types
1According to the article, car hire companies would win more business by prominently advertising “no hidden charges” because all customers hate fee ambushes.
2What systemic problem does obfuscation create beyond individual customer annoyance?
3Which sentence best captures why UK’s Digital Markets Competition and Consumer Act 2024 targets car-hire pricing practices?
4Evaluate these statements about the Hotel UpFront versus Hotel FlyTrap analogy:
Hotel UpFront charges expensive rooms but sensibly prices phone, WiFi, minibar, and parking, while Hotel FlyTrap offers cheap rooms that lure customers who make costly calls and drain minibars.
The analogy demonstrates that moderately savvy customers prefer Hotel FlyTrap because they can dodge hidden charges through careful planning and external alternatives.
Truly savvy customers arrange virtual SIMs and buy 7-Eleven snacks to exploit Hotel FlyTrap’s cheap rooms subsidized by less-careful customers.
Select True or False for all three statements, then click “Check Answers”
5What can be inferred about Harford’s view on AI agents solving price obfuscation problems?
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Gabaix-Laibson’s theory explains that transparency creates adverse selection problems for honest companies. When Hotel UpFront advertises “no hidden charges” with hefty upfront prices, it attracts only moderately savvy customers willing to pay for transparency. Meanwhile, Hotel FlyTrap’s fee-heavy model captures both unsavvy customers (who pay everything) and truly savvy ones (who arrange virtual SIMs, buy 7-Eleven snacks, exploit cheap rooms subsidized by minibar-drainers). This means “no hidden charges” also implies “if you can avoid hidden charges, you should choose our competitors”βtransparent companies lose the most profitable customer segment (ultra-savvy) while competitors profit from customer heterogeneity, enabling hidden charges to flourish “even in markets with costless advertising” where information asymmetry theoretically shouldn’t persist.
The CMA guidance explicitly forbids car-hire companies from adding compulsory local charges that weren’t disclosed at booking time, directly targeting practices Harford experienced with both Europcar and Avis. The CMA argues that even if charges like tourist taxes are inevitably paid later in local currency, they “can and should be mentioned at the time of booking.” This addresses situations where online prices cover drop-off locations but omit mandatory driving fees for those countriesβthe absurd scenario Harford sarcastically imagined where booking systems assume customers would “wrap up the car in brown paper and ask Deutsche Post and Post Italiane to deliver it to Bologna.” The regulation recognizes that calling charges “local” or “inevitable” doesn’t excuse failing to disclose them when customers make purchasing decisions.
Midata made “much more progress in banking than energy” because product complexity fundamentally compounds comparison difficulties. While phone use patterns and electricity consumption vary across consumers, “at least those patterns vary in ways that are easy to compare”βstandardized units enable meaningful evaluation. However, “more idiosyncratic products, or one-off purchases” create exponential complexity: “Where and when did you want to drive that car? How good a view do you want your theatre tickets to have, and would you like to include drinks at the interval?” Consumers want “variety and choice, even customisation, but we also want honest, comparable pricing”βcompeting desires that may be fundamentally irreconcilable. As Harford notes referencing the Rolling Stones, “you can’t always get what you want,” suggesting technological solutions face inherent limitations when product heterogeneity prevents straightforward standardization.
Readlite provides curated articles with comprehensive analysis including summaries, key points, vocabulary building, and practice questions across 9 different RC question types. Our Ultimate Reading Course offers 365 articles with 2,400+ questions to systematically improve your reading comprehension skills.
This is an Intermediate-level article requiring understanding of basic economic concepts (competition, market incentives, adverse selection) while following counterintuitive theoretical arguments through accessible analogies. Readers must grasp how Gabaix-Laibson theory explains transparency’s paradoxical disadvantages, understand the Hotel UpFront/FlyTrap analogy’s distinctions between moderately and truly savvy customers, recognize how obfuscation weakens competitive pressure beyond individual instances, and synthesize personal anecdotes with economic theory and policy solutions. Success requires comfort with economic reasoning without advanced technical knowledgeβrecognizing why “no hidden charges” creates adverse selection, understanding how information asymmetry undermines market efficiency, appreciating regulatory solutions’ complementary role alongside individual consumer savvy. Harford’s accessible writing style and vivid examples make sophisticated economic arguments comprehensible to educated general readers without economics training.
Harford adapts the serenity prayer’s structureβ”grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference”βto consumer contexts: “customers will find themselves acting out a version of the serenity prayer, wishing for the savvy to spot the price traps that can be avoided, the grace to accept the price traps that cannot, and the wisdom to know the difference.” This acknowledges realistic limitations despite regulatory efforts and technological promises. Some traps (bringing 7-Eleven snacks, arranging virtual SIMs) are individually avoidable through preparation; others (mandatory local charges, structural obfuscation weakening overall competition) require systemic solutions beyond individual action. The wisdom componentβ”know the difference”βbecomes crucial: wasting energy fighting unavoidable traps creates frustration, while accepting avoidable ones wastes money. The adaptation suggests consumer empowerment requires both individual savvy and acceptance of structural constraints.
The Ultimate Reading Course covers 9 RC question types: Multiple Choice, True/False, Multi-Statement T/F, Text Highlight, Fill in the Blanks, Matching, Sequencing, Error Spotting, and Short Answer. This comprehensive coverage prepares you for any reading comprehension format you might encounter.