The History of Cities

The Industrial Revolution transformed urbanization by creating concentrated factory employment that drew millions from rural agricultural work to urban manufacturing jobs. Before industrialization, most people worked in agriculture requiring dispersed rural settlement near farmland. Factories centralized production in cities where raw materials, transportation networks, and labor pools converged, creating massive job demand in urban areas. The article notes London grew from one million (1800) to over six million within a decade as the Industrial Revolution spread, while New York reached 12.5 million by 1950 during the Second Industrial Revolution. This employment pull proved so powerful it reversed settlement patterns that had persisted for millennia: the U.S. shifted from 94% rural (1800) to only 60% rural (1900) within a century. The scale and speed distinguish industrialization from earlier urbanization drivers—agricultural cities grew gradually over millennia, but industrial cities exploded within decades as entire economies restructured around manufacturing rather than farming.

Colonization accelerated urbanization in colonies as European powers exploited raw materials and labor, establishing industrial infrastructure serving imperial rather than local needs. The article explains: ‘In many cases, industrialization first spread as colonizers exploited the raw materials and labor of their colonies,’ using Mumbai (then Bombay) as example. Under British rule, Mumbai became ‘an important port city and financial center,’ with ‘British-controlled textile mills and trade’ driving population from over 800,000 by 1900 to 1.6 million by 1950. This colonial urbanization pattern differed from organic European industrialization because it was externally imposed to serve British economic interests—extracting Indian cotton, processing it in British-controlled mills, then exporting products through Mumbai’s port. The article notes industrialization ‘spread again as countries decolonized and became independent nations,’ suggesting colonial urbanization created infrastructure and urban populations that persisted post-independence but then developed according to national rather than imperial priorities. This demonstrates how global urbanization patterns reflect not just economic forces but also power relationships determining who benefits from urban growth.

Urban cycles refer to the pattern where cities experience periods of ‘increasing prominence, innovation and artistry, followed by regression and instability’ rather than steady linear growth. The article provides three examples: Rome peaked at one million (first century BCE) before collapsing to 20,000 during the Middle Ages due to ‘government corruption, poor economy and agriculture, and invasions’; Baghdad thrived as an eighth-century ‘major center of human civilization’ with scientific advances and cultural achievements before the 1258 Mongol invasion ‘destroying much of the city and its great institutions, including the House of Wisdom’; Istanbul experienced ‘periods of significant population decrease due to disease and war’ despite serving as capital of two major empires. These cycles challenge assumptions that urban development inevitably progresses upward—instead, cities prove vulnerable to political collapse, military conquest, economic failure, disease, and agricultural breakdown. Understanding cyclical patterns matters for contemporary planning because it reveals urban prosperity isn’t guaranteed but requires maintaining stable governance, functioning economies, and resilience against shocks. Modern megacities facing infrastructure deficits, climate change, and poverty challenges could potentially experience similar decline if these stresses aren’t addressed.

Readlite provides curated articles with comprehensive analysis including summaries, key points, vocabulary building, and practice questions across 9 different RC question types. Our Ultimate Reading Course offers 365 articles with 2,400+ questions to systematically improve your reading comprehension skills.

This article is rated Beginner because it presents historical information through straightforward chronological narrative with clear cause-effect relationships and accessible vocabulary, though covering substantial temporal and geographic scope. Readers must track basic patterns—ancient agricultural origins, Industrial Revolution transformation, megacity emergence—without requiring specialized historical knowledge or complex analytical skills. The article helpfully defines key terms (urbanization, fertile, nomadic, megacity) and uses familiar geographic references (Mesopotamia, Rome, London, New York). Statistical information remains simple (percentages, population figures, dates) without demanding sophisticated quantitative reasoning. While covering extensive material spanning 9,500 years across multiple continents, the structure follows intuitive chronological progression with clear section divisions. Beginner readers should grasp core concepts: cities formed where food surpluses enabled permanent settlement, industrialization accelerated urban migration, modern cities face infrastructure/poverty challenges. The article avoids theoretical debates about urbanization’s causes or consequences, instead presenting factual narrative about when cities formed, how populations shifted, and what challenges emerged. Success requires following timeline, connecting examples to broader patterns, and understanding that urbanization accelerated dramatically in recent centuries despite ancient origins—skills appropriate for beginning reading comprehension practice.

Distinguishing between natural increase and migration matters because these growth sources create different planning challenges requiring distinct policy responses. The article explains: ‘Much of this growth is due to natural increase—that is, people already living in cities and giving birth to children—but migration also plays a key role.’ Natural increase means existing urban residents having children who remain in cities, representing demographic momentum where current urban populations produce future urban populations even without additional rural-to-urban migration. This contrasts with migration-driven growth where people move from rural areas to cities seeking economic opportunities or escaping crises. The distinction matters for policy because natural increase requires expanding services (schools, healthcare, housing) for growing populations within existing urban areas, while migration-driven growth involves integrating newcomers who may lack urban employment skills, as the article notes: ‘migrants typically bring skills with them, these skills may not fit the available jobs. Difficulty finding work can contribute to and exacerbate poverty.’ Understanding both sources helps leaders ‘prepare for and combat the issues that increased urbanization brings’ by addressing both demographic growth (requiring service expansion) and migration integration (requiring employment matching and poverty prevention). The projected shift to two-thirds urban by 2050 will result from both processes simultaneously.

The Ultimate Reading Course covers 9 RC question types: Multiple Choice, True/False, Multi-Statement T/F, Text Highlight, Fill in the Blanks, Matching, Sequencing, Error Spotting, and Short Answer. This comprehensive coverage prepares you for any reading comprehension format you might encounter.