Access to climate education is a matter of justice
Why Read This
What Makes This Article Worth Your Time
Summary
What This Article Is About
Alexia Leclercq argues that current education systems fail to prepare students for the climate crisis, with UNESCO’s Global Education Monitoring Report showing schools worldwide score only 50 percent on climate curriculum coverage—typically limiting content to science classes that frame climate change as future polar bear problem solvable through recycling. Drawing from Texas public school experience where climate education was superficial, Leclercq contrasts this with transformative learning through PODER’s Young Scholars for Justice program, which centered environmental justice organizing, movements led by people of color, and critical analysis of sociopolitical structures.
This justice-centered approach—incorporating traditional ecological knowledge from her Hakka and Indigenous Taiwanese heritage alongside systemic analysis—transformed Leclercq’s despair into activism, fueling campaigns against petrochemical industry and for fossil fuel phaseout. She advocates for comprehensive climate education integrating traditional ecologies, justice, critical consciousness, social-emotional learning, STEAM, and action-oriented pedagogy. As climate denialism threatens US education policy, Leclercq supports UNESCO’s call for climate education emphasizing sociopolitical root causes and solutions, insisting equitable access to critical climate literacy is prerequisite for empowering youth as changemakers capable of building sustainable futures.
Key Points
Main Takeaways
Inadequate Global Climate Curricula
UNESCO’s Global Education Monitoring Report reveals schools worldwide score only 50 percent on climate curriculum coverage, with content typically confined to science classes rather than integrated across subjects.
Superficial Individual Solutions Focus
Texas public schools exemplified inadequate approach by framing climate change as future polar bear problem with solutions limited to recycling and carbon footprint reduction, avoiding systemic analysis.
PODER’s Justice-Centered Pedagogy
Young Scholars for Justice curriculum transformed Leclercq’s understanding by centering environmental justice organizing, histories of movements led by people of color, local Indigenous cultures, and critical sociopolitical analysis.
Traditional Ecological Knowledge Integration
Leclercq discovered her Hakka and Indigenous Taiwanese ancestral knowledge—cosmological stories of plants, tree spirits, bodhisattva—contained critical climate solutions wisdom previously devalued outside home contexts.
Education as Freedom Practice
Climate justice education transformed despair into action, enabling campaigns against petrochemical industry and for fossil fuel phaseout, demonstrating education’s potential as liberation tool reclaiming culture and reimagining futures.
Comprehensive Climate Literacy Framework
Essential climate education must integrate traditional ecologies, justice, critical consciousness, social-emotional learning, STEAM, and action—going beyond awareness to understanding sociopolitical root causes enabling systemic change.
Master Reading Comprehension
Practice with 365 curated articles and 2,400+ questions across 9 RC types.
Article Analysis
Breaking Down the Elements
Main Idea
Climate Education as Justice Imperative
The central argument positions comprehensive climate education as fundamental justice issue rather than optional enrichment, critiquing mainstream curricula that confine climate content to science classes emphasizing individual behavior change (recycling, carbon footprints) while obscuring systemic power structures. Leclercq demonstrates through personal narrative how justice-centered pedagogy integrating traditional ecological knowledge, critical sociopolitical analysis, and organizing skills transformed passive awareness into transformative action. Her framework rejects depoliticized environmental education in favor of approaches centering movements led by people of color, Indigenous knowledge systems, and structural critique—positioning climate literacy as prerequisite for youth empowerment as changemakers rather than consumers of simplified solutions.
Purpose
Advocate Systemic Education Transformation
Leclercq writes to mobilize support for fundamental climate education reform amid threats from climate denialist administrations and book bans targeting diverse histories. By contrasting inadequate mainstream approaches (Texas schools’ polar bear framing) with transformative justice-centered pedagogy (PODER’s YSJ program), she argues for UNESCO’s call requiring education systems to emphasize sociopolitical root causes alongside traditional knowledge integration. The essay functions as both testimony—demonstrating how critical climate literacy enabled her organizing against petrochemical industry—and advocacy demanding equitable access to comprehensive curricula. Her purpose extends beyond critiquing current deficiencies to modeling alternative pedagogies centering marginalized knowledge systems while preparing students for active citizenship in climate crisis era.
Structure
Literary Opening to Personal Narrative to Policy Advocacy
Poetic Invocation → Global Crisis Context → Personal Experience → Transformative Education → Future Vision. Opens with Uruguayan writer Eduardo Galeano’s 2025 dream establishing aspirational framework immediately contrasted with 2025’s bleak reality of climate disasters and systemic failures. Transitions through UNESCO data documenting curricular inadequacies to personal Texas schooling experience exemplifying superficial approaches. Pivots to transformative PODER pedagogy revealing how justice-centered education integrated traditional knowledge and systemic analysis, enabling organizing campaigns. Concludes with comprehensive climate literacy framework and UNESCO advocacy, positioning education reform as intergenerational obligation. The structure leverages personal testimony’s emotional resonance while grounding claims in institutional data, moving from critique to constructive vision for systemic transformation.
Tone
Testimonial, Hopeful & Urgently Prescriptive
Leclercq balances personal vulnerability with policy advocacy, opening with literary aspiration (Galeano’s dream) before acknowledging bleak realities without succumbing to despair. Her testimonial approach—sharing Texas classroom limitations and PODER transformation—establishes experiential authority while maintaining accessible rather than academic register. The tone emphasizes possibility over doom, framing education as “practice of freedom” and “opportunity to reclaim culture, rewrite history, and reimagine our world.” References to ancestral knowledge (Hakka and Indigenous Taiwanese cosmologies) inject cultural specificity avoiding abstract universalism. Despite acknowledging threats (book bans, climate denialist administrations), she insists “we must keep working,” concluding with hopeful vision that “perhaps in 2055 Galeano’s dream will come true,” positioning optimism as strategic choice rather than naïve denial.
Key Terms
Vocabulary from the Article
Click each card to reveal the definition
Build your vocabulary systematically
Each article in our course includes 8-12 vocabulary words with contextual usage.
Tough Words
Challenging Vocabulary
Tap each card to flip and see the definition
Favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority at the expense of personal freedom; relating to government systems concentrating power in leadership not accountable to the people.
“…far-right and authoritarian regimes have consistently attacked access to public education, books, race and gender history…”
Plural of syllabus; outlines or summaries of the topics covered in educational courses, including required readings, assignments, and learning objectives for specific classes.
“…how extensively education systems cover climate change in their curricula and syllabi.”
In Buddhism, a person who is able to reach nirvana but delays doing so out of compassion to save suffering beings; an enlightened being dedicated to universal liberation.
“The cosmological stories of plants, tree spirits, bodhisattva etc passed down to me from my Hakka and Indigenous Taiwanese ancestors…”
Increasing or growing by accumulation or successive additions; in environmental policy, considering the combined effects of multiple pollution sources or impacts on communities.
“…advocating for a fossil fuel phaseout and cumulative impact policies.”
Adopts, supports, or advocates for a particular cause, belief, or way of life; publicly expresses commitment to a theory, policy, or ideology.
“…as a new administration which espouses climate denialism will soon take power in the United States.”
Relating to or affecting an entire system; fundamental to a predominant social, economic, or political practice; embedded in the structure rather than being individual or isolated.
“We owe it to the next generation to provide them with the tools and knowledge needed to tackle the climate crisis and systemic oppression.”
Reading Comprehension
Test Your Understanding
5 questions covering different RC question types
1According to UNESCO’s Global Education Monitoring Report cited in the article, schools worldwide scored 70 percent on how extensively education systems cover climate change in curricula and syllabi.
2What did Leclercq discover about traditional ecological knowledge through PODER’s Young Scholars for Justice program?
3Which sentence best captures Leclercq’s critique of inadequate climate education in Texas public schools?
4Based on the article’s discussion of climate education components and transformative pedagogy, determine whether each statement is true or false.
PODER’s Young Scholars for Justice curriculum centered environmental justice organizing, histories of movements led by people of color, local Indigenous cultures, and critical sociopolitical structure analysis.
Leclercq argues that climate education should focus exclusively on traditional ecological knowledge and Indigenous wisdom rather than incorporating STEAM (science, technology, engineering, art, mathematics) approaches.
The article mentions that far-right and authoritarian regimes have consistently attacked access to public education, books, and race and gender history across various global contexts.
Select True or False for all three statements, then click “Check Answers”
5Based on Leclercq’s description of education as “a practice of freedom” and “an opportunity to reclaim culture, rewrite history, and reimagine our world,” what can be inferred about her educational philosophy’s relationship to social transformation?
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Confining climate education to science classes treats it as purely technical problem solvable through individual behavior changes like recycling, obscuring the sociopolitical power structures driving climate crisis. UNESCO’s report showing most climate content remains science-only means students miss connections to history (colonialism’s role), economics (capitalist extraction), literature (climate narratives), and social studies (environmental justice movements). Leclercq’s Texas experience exemplifies this—framing climate as future polar bear problem with footprint-reduction solutions avoids systemic analysis of petrochemical industry power, environmental racism, or policy transformation needs. Cross-curricular integration enables understanding climate crisis as interconnected phenomenon requiring justice-centered responses beyond technical fixes.
YSJ curriculum centered environmental justice organizing, movements led by people of color, Indigenous cultures, and critical sociopolitical analysis—contrasting sharply with Texas schools’ depoliticized, science-only approach. While mainstream education offered superficial awareness (polar bears, recycling), YSJ provided tools to analyze power structures causing environmental inequality. Through lessons, art workshops, guest speakers, and organizing initiatives, Leclercq gained language to describe observed inequalities and discovered traditional knowledge’s value. This justice-centered pedagogy transformed her from passive observer to active organizer leading petrochemical industry campaigns, demonstrating how comprehensive approaches integrating critical consciousness, cultural reclamation, and action orientation enable youth empowerment as changemakers.
Traditional ecological knowledge provides ‘critical’ climate solutions wisdom that comprehensive education must center alongside STEAM approaches. Leclercq’s realization that her Hakka and Indigenous Taiwanese ancestral cosmological stories—plants, tree spirits, bodhisattva—contained valuable insights challenged dominant narratives positioning Indigenous knowledge as merely private cultural heritage versus legitimate public knowledge. Her framework demands education validate and integrate these knowledge systems rather than confining them to anthropological curiosities. This represents epistemic justice recognizing marginalized communities’ ecological wisdom developed through generations of sustainable land relationships, offering alternatives to extractive paradigms driving climate crisis. Traditional knowledge integration thus serves dual purposes: honoring cultural identities while accessing practical sustainability insights.
Readlite provides curated articles with comprehensive analysis including summaries, key points, vocabulary building, and practice questions across 9 different RC question types. Our Ultimate Reading Course offers 365 articles with 2,400+ questions to systematically improve your reading comprehension skills.
This article is rated Intermediate because it uses accessible personal narrative structure while introducing educational justice concepts requiring moderate background knowledge. Readers must understand distinctions between mainstream versus justice-centered pedagogy, grasp why confining climate to science classes proves inadequate, and follow arguments connecting traditional knowledge to contemporary organizing. The piece balances concrete examples (Texas schools, PODER program) with abstract concepts (education as freedom practice, systemic oppression), making sophisticated ideas accessible through storytelling. Vocabulary like “curricula,” “eco-anxiety,” and “cosmological” requires context clues but remains manageable. The essay rewards readers familiar with environmental justice movements while remaining comprehensible to those encountering these frameworks for the first time.
Opening with Galeano’s 1995 vision of 2025 featuring “respect for nature, equality and peace” establishes aspirational framework immediately contrasted with approaching 2025’s grim reality of climate disasters, genocide, and systemic failures. This literary device accomplishes multiple purposes: positions current moment as critical juncture between dystopian trajectory and unrealized better futures; invokes Latin American intellectual tradition valuing imaginative possibility; and establishes hopeful tone despite acknowledging bleakness. Concluding by projecting Galeano’s dream to 2055 creates narrative arc from failed past aspirations through present struggles toward future possibility, refusing despair while maintaining urgency. The framing device thus serves rhetorical function of tempering climate education critique with generative vision.
The Ultimate Reading Course covers 9 RC question types: Multiple Choice, True/False, Multi-Statement T/F, Text Highlight, Fill in the Blanks, Matching, Sequencing, Error Spotting, and Short Answer. This comprehensive coverage prepares you for any reading comprehension format you might encounter.
