A Tale of Scientific Bias, Controversy, and Discovery
Why Read This
What Makes This Article Worth Your Time
Summary
What This Article Is About
In 1980, Allen Bergin published a landmark article challenging psychology’s anti-religious bias, prompting a heated response from Albert Ellis, founder of Rational-Emotive-Behavior Therapy. Ellis hypothesized that “religiosity”—devout, orthodox, or dogmatic religion—is significantly correlated with emotional disturbance and that the less religious people are, the more emotionally healthy they’ll be. Bergin countered that religion can be “powerfully benevolent” while acknowledging it’s “not always a positive influence,” arguing Ellis’s hypothesis lacked empirical support.
Richards, then a volunteer on Bergin’s research team, conducted a painstaking literature review in pre-digital 1980, identifying only 24 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Bergin’s 1983 meta-analysis revealed that 77% of findings contradicted Ellis’s hypothesis: 47% showed positive religion-health relationships, 30% showed no relationship, and only 23% showed negative relationships. The debate inspired four decades of increasingly sophisticated research demonstrating that religion and spirituality influence mental and physical health in complex ways—both beneficial and harmful—with certain types like intrinsic religiousness linked to specific mental health aspects while avoiding pathologizing religious belief itself.
Key Points
Main Takeaways
Historic 1980 Debate
Bergin challenged psychology’s anti-religious bias; Ellis countered with the religiosity-emotional disturbance hypothesis claiming devout religion correlates with mental illness.
Sparse Early Research
Pre-digital literature search identified only 24 studies meeting criteria from over 100 examined, revealing how little empirical investigation existed.
Ellis Hypothesis Contradicted
Bergin’s 1983 meta-analysis found 77% of results contradicted Ellis—47% positive relationships, 30% no relationship, only 23% negative relationships.
Complexity Not Simplicity
Religion and mental health are multidimensional phenomena; intrinsic religiousness correlates with freedom from worry but not with open-mindedness.
Measurement Sophistication Needed
Bergin urged specific measures like intrinsic/extrinsic religiousness over broad indicators like church attendance, avoiding pathologizing definitions.
Four Decades of Evidence
Thousands of increasingly sophisticated studies since 1983 confirm religion influences health in complex beneficial and harmful ways, inspiring comprehensive handbooks.
Master Reading Comprehension
Practice with 365 curated articles and 2,400+ questions across 9 RC types.
Article Analysis
Breaking Down the Elements
Main Idea
Scientific Controversy Catalyzes Progress
The article’s central thesis is that the 1980 Bergin-Ellis debate transformed religion-mental health research from an ideologically charged, empirically neglected domain into a sophisticated field generating thousands of studies. This matters because it demonstrates how scientific progress occurs not through consensus but through rigorous engagement with opposing viewpoints backed by systematic empirical investigation. The story reveals how initial bias (psychology’s anti-religious stance) combined with bold challenge and methodological rigor ultimately produced nuanced understanding replacing simplistic narratives.
Purpose
Historical Narrative and Methodological Advocacy
Richards aims to document a pivotal moment in psychology’s history, demonstrate how empirical research can challenge ideological assumptions, highlight the importance of measurement sophistication in studying complex phenomena, and set up discussion of contemporary findings. The piece functions as both personal memoir (Richards participated in the research) and methodological argument for avoiding bias through careful operational definitions that don’t pathologize belief systems a priori.
Structure
Debate → Research → Findings → Legacy
The article opens with Ellis’s religiosity-emotional disturbance hypothesis, describes Bergin’s rebuttal emphasizing religion’s potential benevolence, recounts the painstaking pre-digital literature search process, presents the 1983 meta-analysis results contradicting Ellis, details methodological recommendations for future research, and concludes by noting four decades of subsequent sophisticated investigation. The structure follows chronological progression while emphasizing the detective-work nature of early research and building toward contemporary understanding.
Tone
Personal, Appreciative & Balanced
Richards adopts a personal memoiristic tone when describing his volunteer role and excitement reading Bergin’s article, becomes appreciative when discussing Bergin’s contributions and scientific rigor, maintains balanced fairness when presenting Ellis’s hypothesis without caricature, and shifts to methodologically serious when explaining measurement issues and bias concerns. The piece avoids triumphalism—Richards doesn’t claim Bergin “won” the debate but rather that it sparked productive inquiry revealing complexity neither side initially appreciated.
Key Terms
Vocabulary from the Article
Click each card to reveal the definition
Build your vocabulary systematically
Each article in our course includes 8-12 vocabulary words with contextual usage.
Tough Words
Challenging Vocabulary
Tap each card to flip and see the definition
Gave an impulse to; stimulated or encouraged to action or greater effort; prompted development.
“Bergin’s landmark article challenged this bias and spurred a global movement to include spiritual perspectives in mainstream psychology.”
Inclined to lay down principles as incontrovertibly true; rigidly adhering to doctrine without allowing for doubt or question.
“Devout, orthodox, or dogmatic religion (or what might be called religiosity) is significantly correlated with emotional disturbance.”
A refutation or contradiction of an argument or evidence; a response that disproves or opposes something.
“In Bergin’s rebuttal, he challenged Ellis’s negative views of religion, acknowledging that although religion is ‘not always a positive influence,’ it can be ‘powerfully benevolent.'”
Done with or employing great care and thoroughness; extremely careful and diligent in effort.
“In 1980, computerized literature searches did not exist, so the process was slow and painstaking.”
To cause to take an oblique or slanting direction; to distort or cause to be biased in a particular direction.
“He noted that biases against religion in psychology have become deeply rooted in research, which could skew empirical findings.”
The quality of being thorough, exhaustive, and strict in methodology; scrupulous accuracy and exactness.
“The scope, sophistication, and rigor of these studies have advanced over time.”
Reading Comprehension
Test Your Understanding
5 questions covering different RC question types
1According to the article, Bergin’s 1983 meta-analysis found that the majority of research findings contradicted Ellis’s religiosity-emotional disturbance hypothesis.
2Why did Bergin argue that combining results from the 24 studies did not significantly improve understanding?
3Which sentence best captures Bergin’s methodological recommendations for future research?
4Evaluate the following statements about Ellis’s hypothesis:
Ellis argued that religiosity is equivalent to irrational thinking and emotional disturbance.
Ellis believed that moderate religious involvement promotes emotional health better than complete non-religiousness.
Ellis hypothesized that the elegant therapeutic solution to emotional problems is to be quite unreligious.
Select True or False for all three statements, then click “Check Answers”
5What can be inferred about the state of religion-mental health research in 1980?
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
While the article doesn’t provide detailed definitions, it indicates these represent more specific measures of religiousness than broad indicators like church attendance. Intrinsic religiousness typically refers to religion as an end in itself—genuine spiritual motivation where faith is central to identity and meaning. Extrinsic religiousness treats religion as a means to other ends—attending services for social connections, business contacts, or community status rather than spiritual conviction. Bergin’s research found intrinsic religiousness correlated with certain mental health aspects like freedom from worry but not others like open-mindedness, demonstrating the value of specific versus broad measurements.
While Richards mentions this bias existed and was challenged by Bergin’s landmark article, he references his previous post for detailed explanation. The article hints that the bias became ‘deeply rooted in research’ to the point where mental health measures themselves sometimes classified religious beliefs as pathological by definition. This suggests psychology’s commitment to scientific naturalism and secularism—viewing religion as irrational or neurotic—influenced how researchers designed studies and interpreted findings. Ellis’s hypothesis that religiosity equals emotional disturbance exemplifies this perspective, treating devout belief itself as evidence of psychological dysfunction rather than as something requiring empirical investigation.
Richards spent approximately five to six months working about 10 hours weekly because computerized literature searches didn’t exist in 1980. He describes the process as ‘slow and painstaking,’ physically going to the library and manually searching through scholarly journals, carefully reading dozens of articles like a detective. The team was surprised by how few studies had examined religion and mental health—out of over 100 identified, only 24 met inclusion criteria of having at least one religiosity measure and one mental health measure. This labor-intensive pre-digital process contrasts dramatically with today’s instant database searches, highlighting how technological limitations shaped the scope and pace of systematic research reviews.
Readlite provides curated articles with comprehensive analysis including summaries, key points, vocabulary building, and practice questions across 9 different RC question types. Our Ultimate Reading Course offers 365 articles with 2,400+ questions to systematically improve your reading comprehension skills.
This article is rated as Advanced level. It requires understanding of research methodology including meta-analysis, measurement validity, and operational definitions. Readers must track the debate’s intellectual history across decades, distinguish between intrinsic/extrinsic religiousness and broad indicators, appreciate the challenge of measuring multidimensional constructs, and recognize how ideological bias can influence research design. The piece demands synthesis of personal narrative, methodological critique, and empirical findings while understanding how scientific controversies can catalyze productive research programs. Advanced readers should recognize this as both historical memoir and methodological advocacy for measurement sophistication in studying complex phenomena.
The Bergin-Ellis debate demonstrates that scientific progress happens through controversial challenges to prevailing assumptions backed by systematic empirical investigation rather than through consensus or theoretical argument alone. Bergin didn’t merely assert Ellis was wrong—he conducted painstaking literature reviews revealing sparse evidence despite strong opinions, proposed methodological improvements demanding measurement sophistication, and inspired four decades of increasingly rigorous research. The transformation from an understudied area dominated by ideological bias into a mature field with thousands of studies shows how publicly visible intellectual disagreements, when engaged with empirical rigor and methodological care, can catalyze productive research programs that ultimately reveal complexity neither side initially appreciated.
The Ultimate Reading Course covers 9 RC question types: Multiple Choice, True/False, Multi-Statement T/F, Text Highlight, Fill in the Blanks, Matching, Sequencing, Error Spotting, and Short Answer. This comprehensive coverage prepares you for any reading comprehension format you might encounter.
