10 Novels That Explore Identity

Diana’s definitional boundary—excluding ‘national, cultural, racial or gender identification’—creates a specific curatorial lens focusing on philosophical rather than sociological questions about identity. This distinction separates novels interrogating fundamental questions about consciousness and selfhood (what makes me ‘myself’ independent of any social category?) from identity politics literature exploring how belonging, marginalization, or cultural positioning shapes who we become. The emphasis on ‘purely existential’ matters means these novels ask whether identity survives bodily transformation, psychological fragmentation, or circumstantial reinvention—questions that transcend particular social contexts. Topor’s dismemberment thought experiment or Stevenson’s split consciousness explore problems any conscious being faces regardless of cultural background. This framework explains why the list can span Italian, Japanese, British, and American literature while maintaining thematic coherence: existential questions about personal continuity operate at a more fundamental level than culturally-specific identity formation, even though compelling literature exists in both domains.

The quote—’I learned to recognise the thorough and primitive duality of man; I saw that, of the two natures that contended in the field of my consciousness, even if I could rightly be said to be either, it was only because I was radically both’—articulates Jekyll’s realization that human identity isn’t unified but fundamentally dual, with opposed natures battling for dominance within a single consciousness. The phrase ‘primitive duality’ suggests this split isn’t superficial or culturally created but constitutes something essential about human nature. The crucial insight comes in the paradox: Jekyll cannot ‘rightly be said to be either’ nature exclusively because he is ‘radically both’—meaning identity cannot be reduced to respectable Jekyll or evil Hyde alone but must encompass their co-existence. This challenges assumptions about identity coherence: if we contain fundamentally opposed natures, which represents our ‘true self’? Stevenson’s novella suggests identity might be inherently multiple rather than singular, with civilization merely suppressing rather than eliminating darker impulses that remain part of who we are.

Abe’s novel examines identity by literalizing the question: if your face—the primary marker by which others recognize you and through which you interact with society—changes completely, does your identity change too? The protagonist scientist creates a mask ‘indistinguishable from a real human face’ after disfigurement, believing this will restore his former life. But Diana notes ‘it turns out that his troubles have only began,’ suggesting the perfect mask doesn’t return him to his previous identity but instead enables transformation into someone new—potentially someone worse. The narrative ‘delves into the dark recesses of one increasingly damaged mind,’ implying the mask functions less as restoration than liberation from social constraints that previously governed behavior. This raises disturbing questions: if changing your face changes how you act, was your original identity merely a performance enforced by social recognition? Does the mask reveal your ‘true self’ by removing accountability, or does it create a new self by enabling behaviors previously impossible? The Face of Another suggests identity may be more socially constructed and contingent on physical embodiment than we want to believe.

Readlite provides curated articles with comprehensive analysis including summaries, key points, vocabulary building, and practice questions across 9 different RC question types. Our Ultimate Reading Course offers 365 articles with 2,400+ questions to systematically improve your reading comprehension skills.

This article is rated Advanced because it requires familiarity with international literary canon, philosophical concepts about identity and consciousness, and ability to synthesize thematic connections across diverse works. Readers must understand distinctions between existential and social identity, appreciate why definitional boundaries matter for curation, and follow how different narrative mechanisms (mistaken death, disfigurement, look-alike swaps, psychological fragmentation) all illuminate related philosophical questions. The piece assumes knowledge of major authors—Pirandello, Stevenson, Shelley, Plath—and comfort with terms like ‘semi-autobiographical,’ ‘duality,’ ‘alienation,’ and ‘westernisation.’ Advanced readers must track how Diana’s exclusions (twins, doppelgängers) create meaningful boundaries, understand why she values ‘narratively gripping’ works despite implausibility, and infer her theory that extreme scenarios illuminate existential truths. The article rewards literary sophistication: recognizing references to Nobel Laureates, Six Characters in Search of an Author, The Woman in the Dunes, and connecting these recommendations to broader questions about how fiction explores consciousness, selfhood, and personal continuity through fantastical premises.

While Diana’s framework explicitly excludes gender identification, Fight Club appears as an exception because Palahniuk examines how consumerism and modern alienation specifically fracture masculine identity, making gender central rather than incidental to its identity crisis. Diana describes it as ‘Male identity explored, modern world angst exposed, consumerism laid bare, authority questioned’—positioning masculinity as the lens through which broader existential problems manifest. The underground fighting club represents an attempt to reclaim physical, visceral masculine experience in a world where men feel emasculated by consumer culture and white-collar employment. The novel asks: if traditional masculine roles (provider, protector, physical laborer) vanish, what grounds male identity? However, the book transcends simple gender critique through its ‘twist’—the relationship between narrator and Tyler Durden reveals identity fragmentation that raises existential questions about consciousness and selfhood beyond gender concerns. Diana’s inclusion suggests that while Fight Club engages gendered experience, it ultimately interrogates fundamental questions about identity coherence that align with her ‘purely existential’ framework, using masculinity crisis as entry point into broader philosophical territory.

The Ultimate Reading Course covers 9 RC question types: Multiple Choice, True/False, Multi-Statement T/F, Text Highlight, Fill in the Blanks, Matching, Sequencing, Error Spotting, and Short Answer. This comprehensive coverage prepares you for any reading comprehension format you might encounter.