Zodiacal Mix-up
Why Read This
What Makes This Article Worth Your Time
Summary
What This Article Is About
Jug Suraiya reveals a startling truth about western astrology: the zodiac signs we’ve relied on for personality insights and predictions are based on celestial positions from 2,000 years ago. The constellations observed by ancient Babylonians have shifted due to Earth’s axial precession—a wobbling motion that causes one degree of difference every 72 years in our view of the stars relative to the Sun.
Adding to the confusion, the Babylonians excluded a 13th constellation called Ophiuchus (the Snake Bearer) from their calculations. This means if you think you’re an Aries, you’re actually a Piscean; Scorpios are now Librans, and Sagittarians might even be Ophiuchusians. The article concludes with a witty dismissal of zodiac-based matchmaking and fortune-telling as “ass-trology,” urging readers to recognize the fault lies not in the stars, but in our willingness to believe in such outdated systems.
Key Points
Main Takeaways
Zodiac Signs Have Shifted
Constellation positions have changed significantly over 2,000 years, making traditional zodiac sign assignments astronomically inaccurate for modern times.
Earth’s Wobble Causes Precession
Like a spinning top losing motion, Earth wobbles on its axis, creating one degree of positional difference every 72 years.
The Missing 13th Constellation
Babylonians excluded Ophiuchus from their zodiac system, creating an incomplete foundation that persists in western astrology today.
Your Sign Is Wrong
If you believe you’re an Aries, you’re actually a Piscean; Scorpios are Librans, demonstrating how dramatically signs have shifted.
Matchmaking Mayhem
Zodiac-based compatibility predictions are undermined by these astronomical shifts, rendering traditional pairings essentially meaningless.
The Fault in Ourselves
Quoting Shakespeare, the author suggests the real problem isn’t celestial mechanics but our willingness to believe in astrological pseudoscience.
Master Reading Comprehension
Practice with 365 curated articles and 2,400+ questions across 9 RC types.
Article Analysis
Breaking Down the Elements
Main Idea
Astronomical Drift Invalidates Western Astrology
The central thesis is that western astrology’s zodiac signs are based on constellation positions from 2,000 years ago and no longer align with current astronomical reality due to Earth’s axial precession and the exclusion of a 13th constellation. This astronomical drift fundamentally undermines the credibility of zodiac-based predictions and personality assessments that millions rely upon.
Purpose
To Debunk Astrological Beliefs with Science
Suraiya aims to persuade readers to abandon their faith in western astrology by presenting scientific evidence of its foundational flaws. He uses humor and literary references to make his skeptical argument accessible while encouraging critical thinking about widely accepted pseudoscientific practices. The piece serves as both an educational expose and a satirical commentary on modern superstition.
Structure
Expository → Scientific → Satirical
The article begins by establishing the skeptical perspective, then explains the scientific mechanisms behind axial precession and constellation positions. It provides specific examples of shifted zodiac signs before transitioning to consequences for matchmaking. The piece concludes with literary wit, invoking Shakespeare to deliver its final dismissal of astrology as “ass-trology,” blending scientific exposition with satirical commentary.
Tone
Skeptical, Witty & Informative
Suraiya employs a conversational yet authoritative tone that balances scientific explanation with humor. His skepticism is clear but not condescending, using wordplay like “mumbo-jumbo” and “ass-trology” to lighten the critique. The Shakespeare reference adds intellectual weight while maintaining accessibility. The overall tone suggests an educated person gently mocking a widely accepted belief while genuinely informing readers about astronomical facts.
Key Terms
Vocabulary from the Article
Click each card to reveal the definition
Build your vocabulary systematically
Each article in our course includes 8-12 vocabulary words with contextual usage.
Tough Words
Challenging Vocabulary
Tap each card to flip and see the definition
A large constellation situated near the celestial equator, meaning “Snake Bearer” in Greek, representing the 13th zodiac sign excluded by ancient Babylonians.
“Moreover, the Babylonians did not, for reasons unknown, include in their calculations the presence of a 13th constellation called Ophiuchus, meaning ‘Snake bearer’.”
A slow, circular movement of the axis of a spinning body; in astronomy, the gradual shift in Earth’s rotational axis orientation over thousands of years.
“A reason for this is that, like a spinning top as it loses motion, the Earth ‘wobbles’, causing an ‘axial precession’ that leads to one degree of difference every 72 years.”
In a manner that uses symbolic or figurative language to represent something else; not literally but through comparison or analogy.
“If I remain starry-eyed about the future because my Sun sign tells me to be so, I might be headed for a solar eclipse, metaphorically speaking.”
Relating to supernatural, mystical, or magical powers and phenomena that are beyond ordinary understanding or scientific explanation.
“The fault is indeed in us if we continue to remain underlings to the hocus-pocus of the occult art best described as ass-trology.”
To regard or consider in a specified way; to judge or classify something as having a particular quality or status.
“Scorpios are now deemed Librans, and Sagittarians can be either Scorpios (from Nov 23 to Nov 30) or Ophiuchusians (Dec 1 to Dec 18).”
Naively optimistic or idealistic; having an unrealistically hopeful or romantic view, especially about one’s future prospects.
“If I remain starry-eyed about the future because my Sun sign tells me to be so, I might be headed for a solar eclipse, metaphorically speaking.”
Reading Comprehension
Test Your Understanding
5 questions covering different RC question types
1According to the article, Earth’s axial precession causes one degree of difference in our view of the stars every 72 years.
2What does the author identify as the primary reason skeptics have long regarded astrology as “mumbo-jumbo”?
3Which sentence best supports the author’s main argument that people should not believe in astrology?
4Based on the article, determine whether each statement is True or False.
The Babylonians originally included Ophiuchus in their zodiac calculations but later removed it.
According to the shifted zodiac, someone who thinks they are a Piscean is actually an Aries.
The article uses a Shakespeare quote to suggest that human agency, not celestial positions, determines our fate.
Select True or False for all three statements, then click “Check Answers”
5What can be reasonably inferred about the author’s attitude toward people who continue to believe in astrology despite scientific evidence?
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
Axial precession is Earth’s slow wobble on its rotational axis, similar to a spinning top gradually changing its tilt. This wobble causes our perspective of the stars to shift by one degree every 72 years relative to the Sun. Over the 2,000 years since Babylonian astronomers mapped the zodiac constellations, this has created approximately 28 degrees of difference, meaning the Sun no longer appears in the same constellation during the dates traditionally associated with each zodiac sign.
The article states that the Babylonians excluded Ophiuchus “for reasons unknown,” suggesting historians don’t have definitive answers. However, it’s worth noting that twelve signs may have been preferred because they correspond to the twelve lunar months, creating a tidy calendrical system. Including a 13th constellation would have complicated this symmetry. The constellation Ophiuchus does intersect the ecliptic (the Sun’s apparent path), but the Babylonians chose to divide the sky into twelve equal sections rather than following the actual constellation boundaries.
The article specifically critiques western (tropical) astrology, which is based on the positions observed by ancient Babylonians. However, Vedic or sidereal astrology, common in India, actually accounts for axial precession and adjusts the zodiac positions accordingly. The author’s skepticism extends beyond just technical accuracy—he dismisses astrology fundamentally as pseudoscience regardless of whether it accounts for astronomical shifts, calling it “hocus-pocus” and “ass-trology” in his conclusion.
Readlite provides curated articles with comprehensive analysis including summaries, key points, vocabulary building, and practice questions across 9 different RC question types. Our Ultimate Reading Course offers 365 articles with 2,400+ questions to systematically improve your reading comprehension skills.
This article is rated as Beginner level because it uses accessible language and a conversational tone to explain scientific concepts. While it introduces terms like “axial precession” and “Ophiuchus,” these are clearly defined in context. The author uses familiar analogies (spinning top), literary references (Shakespeare), and humor to make complex astronomical ideas understandable for general readers without requiring specialized scientific background. The argument structure is straightforward and the main takeaway is clearly stated.
Jug Suraiya is a former associate editor with the Times of India who writes regular columns including “Jugular Vein” and “Second Opinion.” His background in journalism and commentary positions him as a cultural critic rather than a scientist, which explains his approach—he’s synthesizing scientific discoveries to comment on popular beliefs and practices. His opinion matters not because he’s an astronomer, but because he represents informed public discourse about how scientific evidence should influence our relationship with pseudoscientific traditions.
The Ultimate Reading Course covers 9 RC question types: Multiple Choice, True/False, Multi-Statement T/F, Text Highlight, Fill in the Blanks, Matching, Sequencing, Error Spotting, and Short Answer. This comprehensive coverage prepares you for any reading comprehension format you might encounter.
