A Simple Way To Measure Knots Has Come Unraveled
Why Read This
What Makes This Article Worth Your Time
Summary
What This Article Is About
Mathematicians Susan Hermiller and Mark Brittenham have disproved a century-old conjecture about the unknotting number—a measurement of how many crossing changes are required to transform a tangled knot into a simple loop. The additivity conjecture, first proposed by German mathematician Hilmar Wendt in 1937, predicted that when two knots are combined, the unknotting number of the resulting knot should equal the sum of the individual unknotting numbers.
Using a decade-long computational project involving dozens of computers running sophisticated knot-identification software called SnapPy, the pair discovered a counterexample: the (2,7) torus knot combined with its mirror image requires only five crossing changes to unknot, not six as the conjecture predicted. This discovery reveals that knot complexity is far more chaotic and unpredictable than mathematicians hoped, fundamentally complicating our understanding of these deceptively simple mathematical objects.
Key Points
Main Takeaways
Historic Conjecture Disproved
The additivity conjecture, which stood for nearly a century, has been definitively disproven using computational methods.
Decade of Computational Research
Brittenham and Hermiller used dozens of computers over ten years, creating unknotting sequences for millions of knot diagrams.
Surprisingly Simple Counterexample
The torus knot and its mirror image provide a shockingly elegant violation of what mathematicians expected.
Unknotting Number Remains Mysterious
Computing unknotting numbers is notoriously difficult, with no clear relationship to a knot’s apparent visual complexity.
Infinite Family of Violations
The discovery led to infinitely many other counterexamples, including almost any torus knot with its mirror image.
Chaos Over Order
The result demonstrates that knot complexity is far more unpredictable and chaotic than mathematicians had hoped.
Master Reading Comprehension
Practice with 365 curated articles and 2,400+ questions across 9 RC types.
Article Analysis
Breaking Down the Elements
Main Idea
The Unpredictability of Mathematical Simplicity
The article demonstrates that a seemingly straightforward measurement in knot theory—the unknotting number—is far more complex and chaotic than mathematicians believed. The disproof of the additivity conjecture reveals that combining knots doesn’t follow the intuitive arithmetic that researchers expected, fundamentally complicating how we understand and measure knot complexity.
Purpose
To Report a Paradigm-Shifting Discovery
The author aims to communicate a significant mathematical breakthrough to a general audience, explaining both the historical context of the problem and the methods used to solve it. The article seeks to convey the excitement and implications of discovering that mathematical reality is messier and more interesting than hoped.
Structure
Historical Context → Problem Development → Solution Narrative
The article begins with Peter Guthrie Tait’s 19th-century work establishing the unknotting number, then traces the development of the additivity conjecture through the 20th century. It culminates in a detailed narrative of Brittenham and Hermiller’s decade-long computational project, building suspense before revealing their counterexample and discussing its implications for the field.
Tone
Explanatory, Enthusiastic & Accessible
The writing balances technical precision with engaging storytelling, using vivid details like computers catching fire and the dramatic “CONNECT SUM BROKEN” message. Expert quotes convey both disappointment and excitement about the discovery, while the author maintains an accessible tone that makes advanced mathematics comprehensible to non-specialists.
Key Terms
Vocabulary from the Article
Click each card to reveal the definition
Build your vocabulary systematically
Each article in our course includes 8-12 vocabulary words with contextual usage.
Tough Words
Challenging Vocabulary
Tap each card to flip and see the definition
The degree to which something is knotted or tangled; a measure of knot complexity.
“Peter Guthrie Tait set out to measure what he called the ‘beknottedness’ of knots.”
A fundamental framework or model that shapes how we understand and approach a subject.
“The result demonstrates that knot complexity doesn’t follow the neat paradigm mathematicians hoped for.”
A practical approach to problem-solving using methods that may not be perfect but are sufficient for immediate goals.
“Mathematicians developed heuristic methods for approximating unknotting numbers when exact computation proved impossible.”
Extremely difficult or impossible to solve, manage, or deal with using available methods.
“Computing the unknotting number remains an intractable problem for most complicated knots.”
Having the same topological properties; able to be continuously deformed into one another without cutting or tearing.
“Two knots are homeomorphic if one can be transformed into the other through stretching and twisting.”
Relating to or using a step-by-step computational procedure for solving a problem or performing a calculation.
“Brittenham and Hermiller used algorithmic approaches to systematically apply crossing changes to millions of knot diagrams.”
Reading Comprehension
Test Your Understanding
5 questions covering different RC question types
1According to the article, two knots are considered the same if one can be twisted and stretched into the other without cutting the string.
2What was the main computational challenge that Brittenham and Hermiller faced in their research?
3Which sentence best captures why mathematicians wanted the additivity conjecture to be true?
4Evaluate these statements about Peter Guthrie Tait’s contribution to knot theory:
Tait introduced the concept of “beknottedness” to measure knot complexity.
Tait successfully proved that his unknotting numbers could distinguish all different knots.
Tait expressed uncertainty about whether he was missing something important in his approach.
Select True or False for all three statements, then click “Check Answers”
5Based on the article’s discussion of reactions to the disproved conjecture, what can we infer about the nature of mathematical progress?
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
A crossing change is the fundamental operation in knot theory where you lay a knot flat, find a spot where the string crosses over itself, cut the string, swap the positions of the strands, and glue everything back together. This operation is crucial because the unknotting number—the minimum number of crossing changes needed to transform a knot into a simple loop—provides a measure of knot complexity.
The additivity conjecture promised mathematical order and predictability. If true, it would have meant that once mathematicians knew the unknotting numbers of prime knots (the building blocks), they could calculate the unknotting numbers for all knots simply by addition. This would have provided a neat, hierarchical organization of knot complexity, making what is currently an impossibly difficult computational problem much more tractable.
The counterexample was surprisingly simple and elegant. The (2,7) torus knot—made by winding two strings around each other three and a half times—has an unknotting number of 3, as does its mirror image. The additivity conjecture predicted their connect sum should require 6 crossing changes, but it actually only needs 5. After nearly a century of searching, mathematicians discovered that this relatively basic knot type violated a fundamental assumption about knot behavior.
Readlite provides curated articles with comprehensive analysis including summaries, key points, vocabulary building, and practice questions across 9 different RC question types. Our Ultimate Reading Course offers 365 articles with 2,400+ questions to systematically improve your reading comprehension skills.
This is an Advanced-level article requiring sophisticated mathematical vocabulary and the ability to follow complex abstract reasoning. It assumes familiarity with mathematical proof concepts, computational methods, and topological thinking. The article demands readers track multiple interconnected ideas across historical context, technical explanations, and philosophical implications about the nature of mathematical knowledge and discovery.
The computational challenge was enormous because Brittenham and Hermiller had to work through millions of knot diagrams corresponding to hundreds of thousands of unique knots. Each knot could be represented by countless different diagrams, and finding the minimum unknotting sequence often requires non-obvious diagram choices. The counterexample was, as Hermiller described, ‘a needle in a haystack’—requiring systematic exploration of an astronomical search space that even modern supercomputers needed years to navigate.
The Ultimate Reading Course covers 9 RC question types: Multiple Choice, True/False, Multi-Statement T/F, Text Highlight, Fill in the Blanks, Matching, Sequencing, Error Spotting, and Short Answer. This comprehensive coverage prepares you for any reading comprehension format you might encounter.
